Marketa Vondrousova vs Jana Fett — Luxembourg Round of 16

Luxembourg · WTA · Round of 16
Marketa Vondrousova
CZE5
Marketa Vondrousova
#132WTA
1907ELO
1826Hard ELO
$33kYTD
$12MCAREER
27 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
CRO
Jana Fett
#524WTA
1580ELO
1523Hard ELO
29 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLL
Vondrousova M.
6-2 6-4
Fett J.
Vondrousova M.
662
Fett J.
240

Marketa Vondrousova defeated Jana Fett 6-2 6-4 in the Luxembourg round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Marketa Vondrousova came in ranked #132.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vondrousova M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fett J.

Fett J.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Vondrousova M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vondrousova M.Fett J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
43%
Service points won·Even
59%
55%
Return points won·Even
46%
46%
Break points saved·Even
57%
54%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.9
6.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (181 vs 136). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vondrousova M.Fett J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
28
Break points saved·Dominant
91
36
Break points won·Clear edge
99
87
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
47
Tiebreaks·Dominant
85
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vondrousova M.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Fett J.
3.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
8.8+303 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.2Hard Elo 1523
9.1Overall Elo 1907
ELO gap
0.9Overall Elo 1580
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
2.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Tauson C.
Ostapenko J.[3]
6-34-66-4
Semi-finals
Ostapenko J.[3]
Samsonova L.[7]
6-17-64
Tauson C.
Vondrousova M.[5]
6-42-66-4
Quarter-finals
Samsonova L.[7]
Bencic B.[1]
6-16-4
Vondrousova M.[5]
Mertens E.[2]
7-56-2
Tauson C.
Bouzkova M.
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[3]
Cornet A.[8]
7-666-2
R16
Samsonova L.[7]
Dodin O.
7-657-63
Bencic B.[1]
Diyas Z.
6-16-3
Cornet A.[8]
Minella M.
6-36-3
Mertens E.[2]
Sasnovich A.
3-66-27-5
Ostapenko J.[3]
Hartono A.
6-24-66-1
Bouzkova M.
Minnen G.
6-36-1
Tauson C.
Alexandrova E.[4]
6-43-67-61
Vondrousova M.[5]
Fett J.
6-26-4
R32
Minnen G.
Parrizas Diaz N.
7-646-717-62
Bouzkova M.
Zhang S.[6]
6-26-736-3
Tauson C.
Sharma A.
6-26-2
Fett J.
Makarova E.
6-36-3
Sasnovich A.
Tsurenko L.
7-57-66
Samsonova L.[7]
Doi M.
6-26-3
Alexandrova E.[4]
Voegele S.
6-13-66-3
Vondrousova M.[5]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-26-3
Diyas Z.
Schmiedlova A.
6-01-66-4
Dodin O.
Zakharova A.
6-746-46-3
Ostapenko J.[3]
Niemeier J.
6-26-2
Minella M.
Gracheva V.
6-36-4
Cornet A.[8]
Potapova A.
6-46-2
Hartono A.
Friedsam A.
7-653-67-64