Illya Marchenko vs Thomas Fabbiano — Istanbul 2 CH Round of 32

Istanbul 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
UKR7
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
Marchenko I.
7-5 6-2
Fabbiano T.
Marchenko I.
762
Fabbiano T.
520

Illya Marchenko defeated Thomas Fabbiano 7-5 6-2 in the Istanbul 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marchenko I.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Fabbiano T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marchenko I.Fabbiano T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.5
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 92). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marchenko I.Fabbiano T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
13
28
Break points saved·Even
80
81
Break points won·Slight edge
7
16
Deciding sets·Clear edge
14
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marchenko I.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Fabbiano T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.8
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.5
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Halys Q.
6-796-36-4
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Uchiyama Y.[4]
7-56-2
Wu T.
Setkic A.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Blancaneaux G.
7-666-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-3
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Tseng C.
6-37-5
Halys Q.
Marchenko I.[7]
3-66-26-2
Grenier H.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Muller A.
6-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Heyman C.
3-66-36-4
Setkic A.
Albot R.[2]
4-66-37-5
Wu T.
Polmans M.[5]
6-23-66-1
Gojo B.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-747-65
R32
Albot R.[2]
Ebden M.
6-41-66-1
Setkic A.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Ito T.
6-36-2
Polmans M.[5]
Kirci K.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Galan D.[3]
6-43-66-2
Blancaneaux G.
Lokoli L.
4-67-656-1
Marchenko I.[7]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-2
Halys Q.
Tomic B.
6-06-1
Tseng C.
Marcora R.
6-12-66-4
Karlovskiy E.
Tiurnev E.
7-54-66-0
Heyman C.
Arnaboldi A.
3-66-26-4
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Moriya H.
6-33-66-3
Donskoy E.[6]
Kuznetsov A.
7-646-1
Grenier H.
Agabigun S.
6-43-66-4
Muller A.
Chappell N.
6-46-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Giustino L.
7-56-1