Christopher Eubanks vs Tennys Sandgren — Cary 2 CH Round of 32

Cary 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
0 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
USA1
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Eubanks C.
0-1
Sandgren T.
Eubanks C.
00
Sandgren T.
11

Christopher Eubanks defeated Tennys Sandgren 0-1 in the Cary 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Eubanks C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Sandgren T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Eubanks C.Sandgren T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
10.4
8.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Eubanks C.Sandgren T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
36
Break points saved·Even
96
92
Break points won·Even
3
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
74
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Eubanks C.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Sandgren T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
3.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[6]
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Krueger M.[6]
Kudla D.[2]
6-23-67-62
Fratangelo B.[8]
Vukic A.
6-727-646-2
Quarter-finals
Kudla D.[2]
Mmoh M.[7]
7-636-3
Vukic A.
Svajda Z.
3-66-26-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Peniston R.
6-37-5
Krueger M.[6]
Purcell M.
6-36-2
R16
Mmoh M.[7]
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Purcell M.
Aragone J.
6-26-2
Svajda Z.
Hijikata R.
7-56-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Mochizuki S.
6-26-1
Peniston R.
Eubanks C.
4-67-666-4
Vukic A.
Caruso S.[3]
6-26-4
Kudla D.[2]
Kovacevic A.
6-726-26-3
Krueger M.[6]
Kelly D.
6-46-4
R32
Kudla D.[2]
Young D.
7-634-66-2
Kovacevic A.
Johns G.
7-636-4
Mukund S.
Staeheli L.
6-35-76-1
Purcell M.
Bolt A.[4]
6-46-1
Aragone J.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-26-3
Kelly D.
Mejia N.
6-46-4
Krueger M.[6]
Kubler J.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.
Jung J.[5]
6-46-4
Vukic A.
Redlicki M.
6-46-4
Caruso S.[3]
Harrison C.
6-36-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Sarkissian A.
6-25-76-1
Mochizuki S.
Blanch U.
7-56-0
Peniston R.
Polansky P.
6-36-2
Mmoh M.[7]
Rubin N.
6-16-3
Eubanks C.
Sandgren T.[1]
0-1
Svajda Z.
Kozlov S.
7-52-0