Holger Rune vs Taro Daniel — Szczecin CH Round of 32

Szczecin CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Holger Rune
DEN
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1729Clay ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
clay
Taro Daniel
JPN
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1542Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
Rune H.
6-3 7-5
Daniel T.
Rune H.
672
Daniel T.
350

Holger Rune defeated Taro Daniel 6-3 7-5 in the Szczecin CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Holger Rune came in ranked #81. Holger Rune claimed a first win over Taro Daniel in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Holger Rune closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-04-18BelgradeR16hardTaro Daniel6-3 6-7(1) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Serve advantage — Rune H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.8
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
93
Break points won·Dominant
84
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
18
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
8.0
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Daniel T.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 51 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
8.6+187 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.4Clay Elo 1542
8.5Overall Elo 1757
ELO gap
1.5Overall Elo 1567
5.0
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
5.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rune H.Daniel T.
Freshness·
—
59

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kolar Z.
Majchrzak K.
7-647-5
Semi-finals
Kolar Z.
Kuhn N.
7-52-2
Majchrzak K.
Hanfmann Y.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Hanfmann Y.
Cias P.
6-27-5
Majchrzak K.
Rune H.
7-656-1
Kolar Z.
De Jong J.
6-26-3
Kuhn N.
Trungelliti M.
6-17-5
R16
Majchrzak K.
Carballes Baena R.[7]
6-36-2
Hanfmann Y.
Cecchinato M.[4]
6-34-67-62
Cias P.
Travaglia S.[8]
7-633-66-2
Kolar Z.
Clarke J.
6-16-1
Rune H.
Andujar P.[2]
6-16-1
Kuhn N.
Rybakov A.
6-26-2
De Jong J.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-47-61
Trungelliti M.
Monteiro T.[6]
6-46-3
R32
Andujar P.[2]
Taberner C.
7-626-4
Rune H.
Daniel T.
6-37-5
Carballes Baena R.[7]
Sachko V.
6-37-65
Cecchinato M.[4]
Novak D.
6-36-3
Cias P.
Kopriva V.
6-24-66-4
Travaglia S.[8]
Nagal S.
3-66-16-4
Kolar Z.
Vesely J.[5]
7-676-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Michalski D.
6-34-66-1
De Jong J.
Lehecka J.
7-653-67-63
Monteiro T.[6]
Diez S.
6-06-3
Kuhn N.
Ramos A.[1]
1-66-46-4
Rybakov A.
Petrovic D.
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.
Gaston H.
3-66-36-3
Majchrzak K.
Pellegrino A.
6-37-67
Trungelliti M.
Martineau M.
4-66-46-3
Clarke J.
Vatutin A.
6-04-0