Alize Cornet vs Mandy Minella — Luxembourg Round of 16

Luxembourg · WTA · Round of 16
FRA8
Alize Cornet
36 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
LUX
Mandy Minella
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Cornet A.
6-3 6-3
Minella M.
Cornet A.
662
Minella M.
330

Alize Cornet defeated Mandy Minella 6-3 6-3 in the Luxembourg round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Alize Cornet came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Alize Cornet extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-16GstaadFclayAlize Cornet6-4 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
Cornet A.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Minella M.

Minella M.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Cornet A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cornet A.Minella M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
45%
Service points won·Even
55%
54%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
45%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (190 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cornet A.Minella M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
3
Break points saved·Dominant
57
6
Break points won·Slight edge
83
72
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
29
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
47
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cornet A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Minella M.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
4.9
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Tauson C.
Ostapenko J.[3]
6-34-66-4
Semi-finals
Ostapenko J.[3]
Samsonova L.[7]
6-17-64
Tauson C.
Vondrousova M.[5]
6-42-66-4
Quarter-finals
Samsonova L.[7]
Bencic B.[1]
6-16-4
Vondrousova M.[5]
Mertens E.[2]
7-56-2
Tauson C.
Bouzkova M.
6-36-2
Ostapenko J.[3]
Cornet A.[8]
7-666-2
R16
Samsonova L.[7]
Dodin O.
7-657-63
Bencic B.[1]
Diyas Z.
6-16-3
Cornet A.[8]
Minella M.
6-36-3
Mertens E.[2]
Sasnovich A.
3-66-27-5
Ostapenko J.[3]
Hartono A.
6-24-66-1
Bouzkova M.
Minnen G.
6-36-1
Tauson C.
Alexandrova E.[4]
6-43-67-61
Vondrousova M.[5]
Fett J.
6-26-4
R32
Minnen G.
Parrizas Diaz N.
7-646-717-62
Bouzkova M.
Zhang S.[6]
6-26-736-3
Tauson C.
Sharma A.
6-26-2
Fett J.
Makarova E.
6-36-3
Sasnovich A.
Tsurenko L.
7-57-66
Samsonova L.[7]
Doi M.
6-26-3
Alexandrova E.[4]
Voegele S.
6-13-66-3
Vondrousova M.[5]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-26-3
Diyas Z.
Schmiedlova A.
6-01-66-4
Dodin O.
Zakharova A.
6-746-46-3
Ostapenko J.[3]
Niemeier J.
6-26-2
Minella M.
Gracheva V.
6-36-4
Cornet A.[8]
Potapova A.
6-46-2
Hartono A.
Friedsam A.
7-653-67-64