Alexandre Muller vs Nick Chappell — Istanbul 2 CH Round of 32

Istanbul 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Alexandre Muller
FRA
Alexandre Muller
#132ATP
1665ELO
1630Hard ELO
$426kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Muller A.
6-4 6-2
Chappell N.
Muller A.
662
Chappell N.
420

Alexandre Muller defeated Nick Chappell 6-4 6-2 in the Istanbul 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Alexandre Muller came in ranked #132.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Muller A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Muller A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Muller A.Chappell N.
11
Serve
—
13
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Muller A.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Even
3.5
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 148). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Muller A.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
75
0
Break points saved·Dominant
94
29
Break points won·Dominant
44
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Muller A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chappell N.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
5.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
6.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Muller A.Chappell N.
Freshness·
100
—

Muller A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Halys Q.
6-796-36-4
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Uchiyama Y.[4]
7-56-2
Wu T.
Setkic A.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Blancaneaux G.
7-666-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-3
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Tseng C.
6-37-5
Halys Q.
Marchenko I.[7]
3-66-26-2
Grenier H.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Muller A.
6-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Heyman C.
3-66-36-4
Setkic A.
Albot R.[2]
4-66-37-5
Wu T.
Polmans M.[5]
6-23-66-1
Gojo B.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-747-65
R32
Albot R.[2]
Ebden M.
6-41-66-1
Setkic A.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Ito T.
6-36-2
Polmans M.[5]
Kirci K.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Galan D.[3]
6-43-66-2
Blancaneaux G.
Lokoli L.
4-67-656-1
Marchenko I.[7]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-2
Halys Q.
Tomic B.
6-06-1
Tseng C.
Marcora R.
6-12-66-4
Karlovskiy E.
Tiurnev E.
7-54-66-0
Heyman C.
Arnaboldi A.
3-66-26-4
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Moriya H.
6-33-66-3
Donskoy E.[6]
Kuznetsov A.
7-646-1
Grenier H.
Agabigun S.
6-43-66-4
Muller A.
Chappell N.
6-46-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Giustino L.
7-56-1