Aldin Setkic vs Radu Albot — Istanbul 2 CH Round of 16

Istanbul 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BIH
Aldin Setkic
#1327ATP
38 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
Radu Albot
MDA2
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1429Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
Setkic A.
4-6 6-3 7-5
Albot R.
Setkic A.
4672
Albot R.
6351

Aldin Setkic defeated Radu Albot 4-6 6-3 7-5 in the Istanbul 2 CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Radu Albot came in ranked #490, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Aldin Setkic claimed a first win over Radu Albot in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-04-17Banja LukaQ1clayRadu Albot6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Setkic A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Albot R.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Setkic A.

Serve advantage — Albot R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Setkic A.Albot R.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Setkic A.Albot R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
46
Break points saved·Dominant
54
85
Break points won·Slight edge
8
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
76
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
9
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Setkic A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Albot R.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
3.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Setkic A.Albot R.
Freshness·
—
93

Albot R.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Halys Q.
6-796-36-4
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Uchiyama Y.[4]
7-56-2
Wu T.
Setkic A.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Blancaneaux G.
7-666-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-3
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Tseng C.
6-37-5
Halys Q.
Marchenko I.[7]
3-66-26-2
Grenier H.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Muller A.
6-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Heyman C.
3-66-36-4
Setkic A.
Albot R.[2]
4-66-37-5
Wu T.
Polmans M.[5]
6-23-66-1
Gojo B.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-747-65
R32
Albot R.[2]
Ebden M.
6-41-66-1
Setkic A.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Ito T.
6-36-2
Polmans M.[5]
Kirci K.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Galan D.[3]
6-43-66-2
Blancaneaux G.
Lokoli L.
4-67-656-1
Marchenko I.[7]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-2
Halys Q.
Tomic B.
6-06-1
Tseng C.
Marcora R.
6-12-66-4
Karlovskiy E.
Tiurnev E.
7-54-66-0
Heyman C.
Arnaboldi A.
3-66-26-4
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Moriya H.
6-33-66-3
Donskoy E.[6]
Kuznetsov A.
7-646-1
Grenier H.
Agabigun S.
6-43-66-4
Muller A.
Chappell N.
6-46-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Giustino L.
7-56-1