Radu Albot vs Matthew Ebden — Istanbul 2 CH Round of 32

Istanbul 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Radu Albot
MDA2
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1429Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 September 2021
hard
AUS
Matthew Ebden
38 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Albot R.
6-4 1-6 6-1
Ebden M.
Albot R.
6162
Ebden M.
4611

Radu Albot defeated Matthew Ebden 6-4 1-6 6-1 in the Istanbul 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Radu Albot came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Radu Albot extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Radu Albot came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 1–6 6–1.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-06-17HalleR32grassRadu Albot5-7 6-1 6-4
2019-03-18Miami MastersR128hardRadu Albot6-0 3-2 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Albot R.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ebden M.

Ebden M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Albot R.Ebden M.
1st serve in·Even
65%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Albot R.Ebden M.
Clutch Rating·Even
46
45
Break points saved·Even
85
86
Break points won·Clear edge
19
32
Deciding sets·Clear edge
76
58
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
29
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Albot R.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ebden M.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
3.2
Surface form
4.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Albot R.Ebden M.
Freshness·
93
—

Albot R.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.
Gojo B.
6-43-66-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Halys Q.
6-796-36-4
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.
Uchiyama Y.[4]
7-56-2
Wu T.
Setkic A.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Blancaneaux G.
7-666-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Grenier H.
6-36-3
R16
Blancaneaux G.
Tseng C.
6-37-5
Halys Q.
Marchenko I.[7]
3-66-26-2
Grenier H.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-46-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Muller A.
6-36-2
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Heyman C.
3-66-36-4
Setkic A.
Albot R.[2]
4-66-37-5
Wu T.
Polmans M.[5]
6-23-66-1
Gojo B.
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-747-65
R32
Albot R.[2]
Ebden M.
6-41-66-1
Setkic A.
Cornea V.
6-46-2
Wu T.
Ito T.
6-36-2
Polmans M.[5]
Kirci K.
6-36-2
Gojo B.
Galan D.[3]
6-43-66-2
Blancaneaux G.
Lokoli L.
4-67-656-1
Marchenko I.[7]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-2
Halys Q.
Tomic B.
6-06-1
Tseng C.
Marcora R.
6-12-66-4
Karlovskiy E.
Tiurnev E.
7-54-66-0
Heyman C.
Arnaboldi A.
3-66-26-4
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Moriya H.
6-33-66-3
Donskoy E.[6]
Kuznetsov A.
7-646-1
Grenier H.
Agabigun S.
6-43-66-4
Muller A.
Chappell N.
6-46-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Giustino L.
7-56-1