Chun Hsin Tseng vs Alexey Vatutin — Banja Luka CH Round of 32

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 September 2021
clay
RUS
Alexey Vatutin
#610ATP
1415ELO
1374Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLW
Tseng C.
6-1 6-4
Vatutin A.
Tseng C.
662
Vatutin A.
140

Chun Hsin Tseng defeated Alexey Vatutin 6-1 6-4 in the Banja Luka CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tseng C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Vatutin A.

Vatutin A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tseng C.Vatutin A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tseng C.Vatutin A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
0
Break points saved·Dominant
83
18
Break points won·Clear edge
15
32
Deciding sets·Clear edge
31
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tseng C.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Vatutin A.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.9+167 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1374
6.4Overall Elo 1554
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1415
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.3
Surface form
2.6
Fatigue & Travel
6.3
Minutes 14d
6.5
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo J.[2]
Milojevic N.[4]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Cerundolo J.[2]
Etcheverry T.[3]
6-36-3
Milojevic N.[4]
Martin A.[1]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo J.[2]
Tseng C.
6-26-0
Milojevic N.[4]
Kolar Z.[7]
6-36-0
Etcheverry T.[3]
Topo M.
6-37-66
Martin A.[1]
Gomez Herrera C.
7-626-3
R16
Tseng C.
Basic M.
6-26-4
Etcheverry T.[3]
Serdarusic N.
4-67-646-1
Kolar Z.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
7-56-2
Gomez Herrera C.
Nagal S.[5]
7-56-3
Martin A.[1]
Mridha J.
6-37-5
Topo M.
Sachko V.
6-13-67-65
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pecotic M.
W/O
Milojevic N.[4]
Krstin P.
6-11-1
R32
Nagal S.[5]
Alvarez N.
6-16-2
Serdarusic N.
Cuevas M.
6-26-4
Sachko V.
Fatic N.
5-76-46-1
Topo M.
Petrovic D.[6]
4-67-646-2
Kolar Z.[7]
Zekic M.
6-36-1
Kuzmanov D.
Shevchenko A.
3-66-46-1
Krstin P.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-23-66-2
Mridha J.
Stricker D.
6-26-3
Pecotic M.
Tepavac M.
4-66-37-60
Milojevic N.[4]
Tadic V.
6-06-3
Cerundolo J.[2]
Jaziri M.
1-66-36-4
Tseng C.
Vatutin A.
6-16-4
Basic M.
Kopriva V.[8]
6-34-67-65
Etcheverry T.[3]
Poljak D.
6-27-5
Martin A.[1]
Guinard M.
0-0