Filip Misolic vs Jonas Forejtek — Tulln CH Round of 16

Tulln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Filip Misolic
AUT
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 September 2021
clay
Jonas Forejtek
CZE
Jonas Forejtek
#312ATP
1387ELO
1364Clay ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Misolic F.
6-7 6-3 6-2
Forejtek J.
Misolic F.
62662
Forejtek J.
77321

Filip Misolic defeated Jonas Forejtek 6-7 6-3 6-2 in the Tulln CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Forejtek J.

Forejtek J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Serve advantage — Forejtek J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Forejtek J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Forejtek J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
10
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
78
Break points won·Dominant
53
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Forejtek J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+300 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Clay Elo 1364
7.0Overall Elo 1587
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1387
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.
Gaston H.[8]
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Moraing M.
Vesely J.[2]
3-67-56-3
Gaston H.[8]
Majchrzak K.[4]
6-33-66-4
Quarter-finals
Vesely J.[2]
Novak D.[7]
6-36-3
Moraing M.
Monteiro T.[3]
6-10-67-65
Majchrzak K.[4]
Huesler M.
7-657-5
Gaston H.[8]
Misolic F.
6-02-66-3
R16
Novak D.[7]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-56-4
Monteiro T.[3]
Rosol L.
7-666-1
Moraing M.
Kovalik J.[5]
2-66-36-4
Huesler M.
Horansky F.
2-66-16-4
Majchrzak K.[4]
Lehecka J.
6-16-0
Gaston H.[8]
Ofner S.
6-16-4
Misolic F.
Forejtek J.
6-726-36-2
Vesely J.[2]
Blancaneaux G.
6-16-1
R32
Horansky F.
Haerteis J.
4-66-46-3
Vesely J.[2]
Neumayer L.
7-57-68
Moraing M.
Miedler L.
6-26-1
Lehecka J.
Janvier M.
6-46-3
Ofner S.
Hassan B.
6-35-77-65
Majchrzak K.[4]
Rune H.
3-66-46-2
Forejtek J.
Martineau M.
6-27-64
Novak D.[7]
Ignatik U.
1-66-46-2
Blancaneaux G.
Stebe C.
6-36-0
Meligeni Alves F.
Melzer G.
6-23-67-5
Monteiro T.[3]
Bachinger M.
3-66-16-1
Rosol L.
Erler A.
6-45-76-1
Kovalik J.[5]
Hanfmann Y.
6-33-67-5
Huesler M.
Dzumhur D.[6]
6-756-26-3
Gaston H.[8]
Oberleitner N.
7-656-2
Misolic F.
Cecchinato M.[1]
7-612-66-2