Tatsuma Ito vs Arthur Fils — Cassis CH Round of 32

Cassis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 September 2021
hard
Arthur Fils
FRA
Arthur Fils
#24ATP
2001ELO
1930Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$7.9MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
Ito T.
7-6 5-7 6-1
Fils A.
Ito T.
715562
Fils A.
613711

Tatsuma Ito defeated Arthur Fils 7-6 5-7 6-1 in the Cassis CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatsuma Ito came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 5–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Fils A.

Fils A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve advantage — Fils A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ito T.Fils A.
—
Serve
56
—
Return
30

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Fils A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Fils A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
89
Break points saved·Dominant
61
98
Break points won·Dominant
9
70
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ito T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fils A.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 98 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ito T.Fils A.
Freshness·
—
88

Fils A.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[1]
Pouille L.[5]
7-646-4
Semi-finals
Pouille L.[5]
Broady L.[8]
6-46-3
Bonzi B.[1]
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Pouille L.[5]
Chidekh C.
7-616-4
Broady L.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-676-4
Zuk K.
Kokkinakis T.
6-47-63
Bonzi B.[1]
Van Assche L.
6-33-66-2
R16
Chidekh C.
Moriya H.
6-36-0
Pouille L.[5]
Ymer E.
7-656-1
Ramanathan R.
Grenier H.
4-66-36-4
Zuk K.
Ito T.
7-56-3
Kokkinakis T.
Safiullin R.
7-6103-66-2
Van Assche L.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-706-3
Bonzi B.[1]
Galarneau A.
7-57-64
Broady L.[8]
Bourgue M.
7-637-60
R32
Moriya H.
Jarry N.
6-47-65
Ymer E.
Muller A.
7-56-4
Pouille L.[5]
Sousa J.
6-17-63
Ramanathan R.
Gulbis E.
6-30-66-2
Grenier H.
Soeda G.
6-46-7116-1
Bourgue M.
Lokoli L.
6-26-2
Broady L.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-26-4
Zuk K.
Rodionov J.[7]
6-36-3
Ito T.
Fils A.
7-6135-76-1
Kokkinakis T.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-26-4
Celikbilek A.
Barrere G.[6]
6-36-3
Galarneau A.
Tomic B.
6-16-2
Bonzi B.[1]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-3
Safiullin R.
Kukushkin M.[4]
6-04-2
Van Assche L.
Watanuki Y.
5-0
Chidekh C.
Cazaux A.
6-46-4