Vitaliy Sachko vs Nerman Fatic — Banja Luka CH Round of 32

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Vitaliy Sachko
UKR
Vitaliy Sachko
#195ATP
1584ELO
1550Clay ELO
$158kYTD
$835kCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 September 2021
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Sachko V.
5-7 6-4 6-1
Fatic N.
Sachko V.
5662
Fatic N.
7411

Vitaliy Sachko defeated Nerman Fatic 5-7 6-4 6-1 in the Banja Luka CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Vitaliy Sachko came in ranked #195, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Vitaliy Sachko extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-11-06SofiaQ2hardVitaliy Sachko6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(7)

Serve vs return

This season
Sachko V.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Sachko V.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sachko V.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sachko V.Fatic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
51
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
81
63
Break points won·Clear edge
48
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
76
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
19
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sachko V.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.3+72 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Clay Elo 1478
5.4Overall Elo 1584
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1496
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
5.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sachko V.Fatic N.
Freshness·
83
—

Sachko V.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 35 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo J.[2]
Milojevic N.[4]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Cerundolo J.[2]
Etcheverry T.[3]
6-36-3
Milojevic N.[4]
Martin A.[1]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo J.[2]
Tseng C.
6-26-0
Milojevic N.[4]
Kolar Z.[7]
6-36-0
Etcheverry T.[3]
Topo M.
6-37-66
Martin A.[1]
Gomez Herrera C.
7-626-3
R16
Tseng C.
Basic M.
6-26-4
Etcheverry T.[3]
Serdarusic N.
4-67-646-1
Kolar Z.[7]
Kuzmanov D.
7-56-2
Gomez Herrera C.
Nagal S.[5]
7-56-3
Martin A.[1]
Mridha J.
6-37-5
Topo M.
Sachko V.
6-13-67-65
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pecotic M.
W/O
Milojevic N.[4]
Krstin P.
6-11-1
R32
Nagal S.[5]
Alvarez N.
6-16-2
Serdarusic N.
Cuevas M.
6-26-4
Sachko V.
Fatic N.
5-76-46-1
Topo M.
Petrovic D.[6]
4-67-646-2
Kolar Z.[7]
Zekic M.
6-36-1
Kuzmanov D.
Shevchenko A.
3-66-46-1
Krstin P.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-23-66-2
Mridha J.
Stricker D.
6-26-3
Pecotic M.
Tepavac M.
4-66-37-60
Milojevic N.[4]
Tadic V.
6-06-3
Cerundolo J.[2]
Jaziri M.
1-66-36-4
Tseng C.
Vatutin A.
6-16-4
Basic M.
Kopriva V.[8]
6-34-67-65
Etcheverry T.[3]
Poljak D.
6-27-5
Martin A.[1]
Guinard M.
0-0