Jack Draper vs Michael Geerts — Seville CH Round of 32

Seville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1697Clay ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 September 2021
clay
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1348Clay ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Draper J.
6-3 6-2
Geerts M.
Draper J.
662
Geerts M.
320

Jack Draper defeated Michael Geerts 6-3 6-2 in the Seville CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jack Draper came in ranked #145.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Draper J.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Serve advantage — Draper J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draper J.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
66%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draper J.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
9
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
82
Break points won·Dominant
83
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draper J.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Geerts M.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+349 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1348
10.0Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1400
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
5.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
0.0
7.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draper J.Geerts M.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
89

Draper J.: 18 days rest · Geerts M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Martinez P.[2]
Carballes Baena R.[3]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Martinez P.[2]
Taberner C.[4]
6-46-3
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Barrios Vera T.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Martinez P.[2]
Cobolli F.
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Moroni G.
6-40-67-5
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Darderi L.
7-57-65
Barrios Vera T.
Andujar P.[1]
7-612-66-4
R16
Martinez P.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-44-66-4
Cobolli F.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-37-5
Taberner C.[4]
Lenz J.
6-36-3
Darderi L.
Gaio F.[6]
6-07-61
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-1
Andujar P.[1]
Lopez San Martin A.
3-66-16-4
Moroni G.
Zapata Miralles B.[5]
3-66-16-4
Barrios Vera T.
Draper J.
6-5
R32
Martinez P.[2]
Nava E.
7-56-4
Brancaccio R.
Olivieri G.
6-22-67-64
Cobolli F.
Giustino L.[8]
6-06-2
Taberner C.[4]
Gerch L.
6-16-4
Lenz J.
Oliveira G.
6-24-66-2
Zapata Miralles B.[5]
Baldi F.
6-36-2
Gaio F.[6]
Gabashvili T.
6-26-1
Andreev A.
Ortega Olmedo R.
7-626-0
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Ocleppo J.
6-23-66-3
Barrios Vera T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
4-66-27-5
Draper J.
Geerts M.
6-36-2
Andujar P.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-27-5
Lopez San Martin A.
Winter Lopez B.
6-44-66-1
Moroni G.
Kuhn N.
7-656-1
Llamas Ruiz P.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-54-1
Darderi L.
Gimeno Valero C.
3-0