Clement Chidekh vs Arthur Cazaux — Cassis CH Round of 32

Cassis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Clement Chidekh
#207ATP
1513ELO
1523Hard ELO
$92kYTD
$401kCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 September 2021
hard
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#98ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
Chidekh C.
6-4 6-4
Cazaux A.
Chidekh C.
662
Cazaux A.
440

Clement Chidekh defeated Arthur Cazaux 6-4 6-4 in the Cassis CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Arthur Cazaux came in ranked #98.

Key context

  • Match story: Clement Chidekh edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chidekh C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Cazaux A.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Chidekh C.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Chidekh C.Cazaux A.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
19

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Chidekh C.Cazaux A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.8
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (144 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chidekh C.Cazaux A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
65
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
97
Break points won·Clear edge
9
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
12
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chidekh C.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 1827 days (−1.5)
Cazaux A.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.8Hard Elo 1523
Surface ELO
7.2+215 Hard Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1513
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1793
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Chidekh C.Cazaux A.
Freshness·
66
—

Chidekh C.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[1]
Pouille L.[5]
7-646-4
Semi-finals
Pouille L.[5]
Broady L.[8]
6-46-3
Bonzi B.[1]
Zuk K.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Pouille L.[5]
Chidekh C.
7-616-4
Broady L.[8]
Ramanathan R.
7-676-4
Zuk K.
Kokkinakis T.
6-47-63
Bonzi B.[1]
Van Assche L.
6-33-66-2
R16
Chidekh C.
Moriya H.
6-36-0
Pouille L.[5]
Ymer E.
7-656-1
Ramanathan R.
Grenier H.
4-66-36-4
Zuk K.
Ito T.
7-56-3
Kokkinakis T.
Safiullin R.
7-6103-66-2
Van Assche L.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-706-3
Bonzi B.[1]
Galarneau A.
7-57-64
Broady L.[8]
Bourgue M.
7-637-60
R32
Moriya H.
Jarry N.
6-47-65
Ymer E.
Muller A.
7-56-4
Pouille L.[5]
Sousa J.
6-17-63
Ramanathan R.
Gulbis E.
6-30-66-2
Grenier H.
Soeda G.
6-46-7116-1
Bourgue M.
Lokoli L.
6-26-2
Broady L.[8]
Escobedo E.
6-26-4
Zuk K.
Rodionov J.[7]
6-36-3
Ito T.
Fils A.
7-6135-76-1
Kokkinakis T.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-26-4
Celikbilek A.
Barrere G.[6]
6-36-3
Galarneau A.
Tomic B.
6-16-2
Bonzi B.[1]
Fabbiano T.
7-56-3
Safiullin R.
Kukushkin M.[4]
6-04-2
Van Assche L.
Watanuki Y.
5-0
Chidekh C.
Cazaux A.
6-46-4