Pablo Andujar vs Javier Barranco Cosano — Seville CH Round of 32

Seville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP1
Pablo Andujar
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 September 2021
clay
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
Andujar P.
6-2 7-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Andujar P.
672
Barranco Cosano J.
250

Pablo Andujar defeated Javier Barranco Cosano 6-2 7-5 in the Seville CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Pablo Andujar closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Andujar P.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Barranco Cosano J.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Andujar P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Andujar P.Barranco Cosano J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Even
57%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (91 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Andujar P.Barranco Cosano J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
38
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
70
Break points won·Slight edge
40
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
5
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Andujar P.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Barranco Cosano J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
7.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.0
3-set count
0.0
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Martinez P.[2]
Carballes Baena R.[3]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Martinez P.[2]
Taberner C.[4]
6-46-3
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Barrios Vera T.
6-16-3
Quarter-finals
Martinez P.[2]
Cobolli F.
6-46-2
Taberner C.[4]
Moroni G.
6-40-67-5
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Darderi L.
7-57-65
Barrios Vera T.
Andujar P.[1]
7-612-66-4
R16
Martinez P.[2]
Brancaccio R.
6-44-66-4
Cobolli F.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-37-5
Taberner C.[4]
Lenz J.
6-36-3
Darderi L.
Gaio F.[6]
6-07-61
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Andreev A.
6-46-1
Andujar P.[1]
Lopez San Martin A.
3-66-16-4
Moroni G.
Zapata Miralles B.[5]
3-66-16-4
Barrios Vera T.
Draper J.
6-5
R32
Martinez P.[2]
Nava E.
7-56-4
Brancaccio R.
Olivieri G.
6-22-67-64
Cobolli F.
Giustino L.[8]
6-06-2
Taberner C.[4]
Gerch L.
6-16-4
Lenz J.
Oliveira G.
6-24-66-2
Zapata Miralles B.[5]
Baldi F.
6-36-2
Gaio F.[6]
Gabashvili T.
6-26-1
Andreev A.
Ortega Olmedo R.
7-626-0
Carballes Baena R.[3]
Ocleppo J.
6-23-66-3
Barrios Vera T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
4-66-27-5
Draper J.
Geerts M.
6-36-2
Andujar P.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-27-5
Lopez San Martin A.
Winter Lopez B.
6-44-66-1
Moroni G.
Kuhn N.
7-656-1
Llamas Ruiz P.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-54-1
Darderi L.
Gimeno Valero C.
3-0