Lukas Lacko vs Johannes Haerteis — Manacor CH Round of 32

Manacor CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 August 2021
hard
GER
Johannes Haerteis
30 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLL
Lacko L.
6-2 6-3
Haerteis J.
Lacko L.
662
Haerteis J.
230

Lukas Lacko defeated Johannes Haerteis 6-2 6-3 in the Manacor CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lacko L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Haerteis J.

Haerteis J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lacko L.Haerteis J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
34%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (60 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lacko L.Haerteis J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
71
Break points won·Even
8
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
76
Tiebreaks·Even
27
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lacko L.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Haerteis J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
4.3
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 8
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lacko L.
Uchiyama Y.[1]
5-77-686-1
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Geerts M.
4-66-17-5
Lacko L.
Kamke T.
6-06-3
Quarter-finals
Kamke T.
Verdasco F.[2]
6-36-1
Lacko L.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-57-5
Geerts M.
Sousa J.[4]
2-66-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Ramanathan R.
4-66-47-65
R16
Verdasco F.[2]
Kozlov S.
1-67-666-2
Kamke T.
Chappell N.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Viola M.
3-67-56-0
Lacko L.
Kuzmanov D.
6-27-69
Geerts M.
Barrios Vera T.[6]
4-66-26-1
Sousa J.[4]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-36-3
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Zielinski J.
6-16-2
Ramanathan R.
Ofner S.[5]
7-50-0
R32
Verdasco F.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-36-2
Kuzmanov D.
Zuk K.[7]
6-36-4
Ortega Olmedo R.
Mejia N.
7-57-5
Sousa J.[4]
Moriya H.
6-41-67-5
Ofner S.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-756-36-2
Ramanathan R.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-716-47-5
Zielinski J.
Gonzalez A.
6-757-616-4
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-47-63
Lacko L.
Haerteis J.
6-26-3
Geerts M.
Ito T.
4-66-26-1
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Diez S.
4-63-3
Kozlov S.
Rincon D.
6-31-66-1
Chappell N.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-1
Kamke T.
Rola B.[8]
6-46-4
Viola M.
Broady L.[3]
6-43-66-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Tomic B.
6-36-1