Nick Chappell vs Evgeny Karlovskiy — Manacor CH Round of 32

Manacor CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 August 2021
hard
RUS
Evgeny Karlovskiy
#1219ATP
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWW
Chappell N.
6-3 6-1
Karlovskiy E.
Chappell N.
662
Karlovskiy E.
310

Nick Chappell defeated Evgeny Karlovskiy 6-3 6-1 in the Manacor CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chappell N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Karlovskiy E.

Karlovskiy E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Serve advantage — Karlovskiy E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chappell N.Karlovskiy E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (148 vs 170). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chappell N.Karlovskiy E.
Clutch Rating·Even
0
0
Break points saved·Dominant
29
55
Break points won·Even
8
5
Deciding sets·Even
3
7
Tiebreaks·Even
13
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chappell N.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Karlovskiy E.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
3.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
6.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Lacko L.
Uchiyama Y.[1]
5-77-686-1
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Geerts M.
4-66-17-5
Lacko L.
Kamke T.
6-06-3
Quarter-finals
Kamke T.
Verdasco F.[2]
6-36-1
Lacko L.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-57-5
Geerts M.
Sousa J.[4]
2-66-36-4
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Ramanathan R.
4-66-47-65
R16
Verdasco F.[2]
Kozlov S.
1-67-666-2
Kamke T.
Chappell N.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Viola M.
3-67-56-0
Lacko L.
Kuzmanov D.
6-27-69
Geerts M.
Barrios Vera T.[6]
4-66-26-1
Sousa J.[4]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-36-3
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Zielinski J.
6-16-2
Ramanathan R.
Ofner S.[5]
7-50-0
R32
Verdasco F.[2]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-36-2
Kuzmanov D.
Zuk K.[7]
6-36-4
Ortega Olmedo R.
Mejia N.
7-57-5
Sousa J.[4]
Moriya H.
6-41-67-5
Ofner S.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-756-36-2
Ramanathan R.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-716-47-5
Zielinski J.
Gonzalez A.
6-757-616-4
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Alvarez Varona N.
6-47-63
Lacko L.
Haerteis J.
6-26-3
Geerts M.
Ito T.
4-66-26-1
Uchiyama Y.[1]
Diez S.
4-63-3
Kozlov S.
Rincon D.
6-31-66-1
Chappell N.
Karlovskiy E.
6-36-1
Kamke T.
Rola B.[8]
6-46-4
Viola M.
Broady L.[3]
6-43-66-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Tomic B.
6-36-1