Andrea Vavassori vs Jack Draper — Como CH Round of 32

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Andrea Vavassori
#563ATP
1688ELO
1642Clay ELO
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 29 August 2021
clay
Jack Draper
GBR
Jack Draper
#145ATP
1822ELO
1697Clay ELO
$305kYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWW
Vavassori A.
6-4 2-6 6-3
Draper J.
Vavassori A.
6262
Draper J.
4631

Andrea Vavassori defeated Jack Draper 6-4 2-6 6-3 in the Como CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jack Draper came in ranked #145, but Andrea Vavassori had arrived on a 4-match winning run.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Vavassori A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Draper J.

Draper J.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Vavassori A.

Serve advantage — Draper J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vavassori A.Draper J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
77%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.5
8.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vavassori A.Draper J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
88
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
99
Break points won·Dominant
33
83
Deciding sets·Dominant
58
96
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
82
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Vavassori A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Draper J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
3.2Clay Elo 1642
Surface ELO
6.8+54 Clay Elo edge
2.3Overall Elo 1688
ELO gap
7.7Overall Elo 1822
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Vavassori A.Draper J.
Freshness·
—
100

Draper J.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo J.[4]
Moroni G.
7-57-67
Semi-finals
Moroni G.
Vavassori A.
6-33-64-0
Cerundolo J.[4]
Altmaier D.[1]
6-43-0
Quarter-finals
Vavassori A.
Kovalik J.[2]
6-36-4
Moroni G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-34-66-2
Cerundolo J.[4]
Serdarusic N.
7-56-2
Altmaier D.[1]
Bonadio R.
7-636-3
R16
Kovalik J.[2]
Agamenone F.
6-27-61
Vavassori A.
Kuznetsov A.
2-66-36-4
Arnaboldi A.
Martin A.[3]
4-66-46-3
Moroni G.
Gaio F.[5]
7-56-1
Serdarusic N.
Cobolli F.
6-46-0
Bonadio R.
Iannaccone F.
6-26-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Menezes J.
6-07-5
Cerundolo J.[4]
Zeppieri G.
5-0
R32
Moroni G.
Vatutin A.
3-0
Kovalik J.[2]
Lenz J.
7-56-2
Agamenone F.
Borges N.
6-36-1
Vavassori A.
Draper J.
6-42-66-3
Kuznetsov A.
Nagal S.[6]
6-47-64
Martin A.[3]
Forti F.
5-76-26-1
Arnaboldi A.
Gabashvili T.
7-656-2
Serdarusic N.
Huesler M.[7]
6-46-3
Zeppieri G.
Miedler L.
4-66-26-4
Cerundolo J.[4]
Lamasine T.
6-47-62
Bonadio R.
Erler A.
3-66-36-3
Iannaccone F.
Ugo Carabelli C.
5-76-36-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Domingues J.
6-26-0
Gaio F.[5]
Chrysochos P.
6-13-66-3
Cobolli F.
Cagnina J.
6-13-3
Menezes J.
Furness E.
4-1