Federico Gaio vs Petros Chrysochos — Como CH Round of 32

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA5
Federico Gaio
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 29 August 2021
clay
CYP
Petros Chrysochos
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLLW
Gaio F.
6-1 3-6 6-3
Chrysochos P.
Gaio F.
6362
Chrysochos P.
1631

Federico Gaio defeated Petros Chrysochos 6-1 3-6 6-3 in the Como CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Federico Gaio closed it out in three sets, 6–1 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaio F.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Chrysochos P.

Chrysochos P.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gaio F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaio F.Chrysochos P.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 11). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gaio F.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chrysochos P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.4
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo J.[4]
Moroni G.
7-57-67
Semi-finals
Moroni G.
Vavassori A.
6-33-64-0
Cerundolo J.[4]
Altmaier D.[1]
6-43-0
Quarter-finals
Vavassori A.
Kovalik J.[2]
6-36-4
Moroni G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-34-66-2
Cerundolo J.[4]
Serdarusic N.
7-56-2
Altmaier D.[1]
Bonadio R.
7-636-3
R16
Kovalik J.[2]
Agamenone F.
6-27-61
Vavassori A.
Kuznetsov A.
2-66-36-4
Arnaboldi A.
Martin A.[3]
4-66-46-3
Moroni G.
Gaio F.[5]
7-56-1
Serdarusic N.
Cobolli F.
6-46-0
Bonadio R.
Iannaccone F.
6-26-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Menezes J.
6-07-5
Cerundolo J.[4]
Zeppieri G.
5-0
R32
Moroni G.
Vatutin A.
3-0
Kovalik J.[2]
Lenz J.
7-56-2
Agamenone F.
Borges N.
6-36-1
Vavassori A.
Draper J.
6-42-66-3
Kuznetsov A.
Nagal S.[6]
6-47-64
Martin A.[3]
Forti F.
5-76-26-1
Arnaboldi A.
Gabashvili T.
7-656-2
Serdarusic N.
Huesler M.[7]
6-46-3
Zeppieri G.
Miedler L.
4-66-26-4
Cerundolo J.[4]
Lamasine T.
6-47-62
Bonadio R.
Erler A.
3-66-36-3
Iannaccone F.
Ugo Carabelli C.
5-76-36-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Domingues J.
6-26-0
Gaio F.[5]
Chrysochos P.
6-13-66-3
Cobolli F.
Cagnina J.
6-13-3
Menezes J.
Furness E.
4-1