Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Daniel Altmaier — Como CH Semi-final

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
ARG4
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
#45ATP
1790ELO
1762Clay ELO
$752kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLWWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Sunday, 29 August 2021
clay
Daniel Altmaier
GER1
Daniel Altmaier
#60ATP
1734ELO
1693Clay ELO
$574kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWWWLL
Cerundolo J.
6-4 3-0
Altmaier D.
Cerundolo J.
63–
Altmaier D.
40–

Juan Manuel Cerundolo advanced when Daniel Altmaier retired 6-4 3-0 in the Como CH semi-final. Juan Manuel Cerundolo extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-04-22Madrid MastersR128clayJuan Manuel Cerundolo6-4 6-4
2026-02-09Buenos AiresR32clayJuan Manuel Cerundolo6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Cerundolo J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Altmaier D.

Altmaier D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cerundolo J.

Serve advantage — Cerundolo J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Cerundolo J.Altmaier D.
15
Serve
40
41
Return
11

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cerundolo J.Altmaier D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
6.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cerundolo J.Altmaier D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
85
71
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
96
Break points won·Dominant
80
34
Deciding sets·Slight edge
98
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
96
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cerundolo J.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Altmaier D.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.2+69 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Clay Elo 1693
5.1Overall Elo 1790
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1734
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.9
Surface form
8.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
2.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cerundolo J.Altmaier D.
Freshness·Even
100
96

Cerundolo J.: 15 days rest · Altmaier D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo J.[4]
Moroni G.
7-57-67
Semi-finals
Moroni G.
Vavassori A.
6-33-64-0
Cerundolo J.[4]
Altmaier D.[1]
6-43-0
Quarter-finals
Vavassori A.
Kovalik J.[2]
6-36-4
Moroni G.
Arnaboldi A.
6-34-66-2
Cerundolo J.[4]
Serdarusic N.
7-56-2
Altmaier D.[1]
Bonadio R.
7-636-3
R16
Kovalik J.[2]
Agamenone F.
6-27-61
Vavassori A.
Kuznetsov A.
2-66-36-4
Arnaboldi A.
Martin A.[3]
4-66-46-3
Moroni G.
Gaio F.[5]
7-56-1
Serdarusic N.
Cobolli F.
6-46-0
Bonadio R.
Iannaccone F.
6-26-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Menezes J.
6-07-5
Cerundolo J.[4]
Zeppieri G.
5-0
R32
Moroni G.
Vatutin A.
3-0
Kovalik J.[2]
Lenz J.
7-56-2
Agamenone F.
Borges N.
6-36-1
Vavassori A.
Draper J.
6-42-66-3
Kuznetsov A.
Nagal S.[6]
6-47-64
Martin A.[3]
Forti F.
5-76-26-1
Arnaboldi A.
Gabashvili T.
7-656-2
Serdarusic N.
Huesler M.[7]
6-46-3
Zeppieri G.
Miedler L.
4-66-26-4
Cerundolo J.[4]
Lamasine T.
6-47-62
Bonadio R.
Erler A.
3-66-36-3
Iannaccone F.
Ugo Carabelli C.
5-76-36-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Domingues J.
6-26-0
Gaio F.[5]
Chrysochos P.
6-13-66-3
Cobolli F.
Cagnina J.
6-13-3
Menezes J.
Furness E.
4-1