Bethanie Mattek Sands vs Ena Shibahara — Cleveland Round of 32

Cleveland · WTA · Round of 32
USA
Bethanie Mattek Sands
41 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
hard
Ena Shibahara
JPN
Ena Shibahara
#477WTA
1464ELO
1438Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLL
Mattek Sands B.
6-4 3-6 6-1
Shibahara E.
Mattek Sands B.
6362
Shibahara E.
4611

Bethanie Mattek Sands defeated Ena Shibahara 6-4 3-6 6-1 in the Cleveland round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Bethanie Mattek Sands came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mattek Sands B.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Shibahara E.

Shibahara E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mattek Sands B.

Serve advantage — Shibahara E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mattek Sands B.Shibahara E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
59%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
48%
Service points won·Even
54%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
50%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mattek Sands B.Shibahara E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
18
47
Break points saved·Clear edge
52
74
Break points won·Even
61
65
Deciding sets·Clear edge
17
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
52
91

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mattek Sands B.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 201 days (−1.5)
Shibahara E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.5
Surface form
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kontaveit A.[2]
Begu I.
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Kontaveit A.[2]
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
6-46-4
Begu I.
Linette M.[6]
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Linette M.[6]
Kasatkina D.[1]
6-16-2
Begu I.
Sasnovich A.
6-26-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Zhang S.[9]
6-36-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Siniakova K.
6-35-76-2
R16
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Zvonareva V.
W/O
Sasnovich A.
Podoroska N.[5]
6-776-46-4
Kasatkina D.[1]
Mcnally C.
2-66-46-2
Linette M.[6]
Fruhvirtova L.
7-626-4
Begu I.
Hercog P.
7-657-5
Siniakova K.
Hanatani N.
6-06-0
Zhang S.[9]
Mattek Sands B.
6-47-67
Kontaveit A.[2]
Garcia C.
6-36-3
R32
Hanatani N.
Blinkova A.
1-0
Siniakova K.
Rogers S.[8]
7-56-1
Hercog P.
Mateas M.
6-36-2
Mattek Sands B.
Shibahara E.
6-43-66-1
Fruhvirtova L.
Moore T.
6-47-5
Kasatkina D.[1]
Juvan K.
6-36-3
Mcnally C.
Danilina A.
7-645-76-4
Linette M.[6]
Bektas E.
7-666-4
Begu I.
Alexandrova E.[3]
7-636-3
Sasnovich A.
Mchale C.
6-47-5
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Glatch A.
6-26-1
Zvonareva V.
Eikeri U.
6-46-2
Zhang S.[9]
Trevisan M.
7-56-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Davis L.
1-66-06-0
Garcia C.
Harrison C.
6-16-2
Podoroska N.[5]
Pera B.
6-26-4