Mikael Ymer vs Albert Ramos — Winston-Salem Round of 32

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 32
SWE
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
hard
ESP11
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1520Hard ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Ymer M.
6-3 6-1
Ramos A.
Ymer M.
662
Ramos A.
310

Mikael Ymer defeated Albert Ramos 6-3 6-1 in the Winston-Salem round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Mikael Ymer claimed a first win over Albert Ramos in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-07-07BastadQ1clayAlbert Ramos6-1 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer M.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Even
67%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Even
2.2
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer M.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
71
59
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
95
Break points won·Clear edge
71
49
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
80
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
29
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ymer M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Ramos A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
2.4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.9
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ivashka I.
Ymer M.
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Ymer M.
Alcaraz C.[15]
7-56-3
Ivashka I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Alcaraz C.[15]
Giron M.
7-626-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Gasquet R.[14]
7-656-1
Ivashka I.
Carreno Busta P.[1]
7-626-3
Ymer M.
Tiafoe F.[13]
6-726-26-3
R16
Tiafoe F.[13]
Monteiro T.
7-57-62
Ymer M.
Purcell M.
7-56-2
Alcaraz C.[15]
Fucsovics M.[4]
6-30-66-2
Giron M.
Herbert P.
4-66-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Paire B.[12]
6-44-66-1
Gasquet R.[14]
Evans D.[3]
6-47-64
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Koepfer D.[16]
6-26-3
Ivashka I.
Struff J.[9]
6-26-1
R32
Gasquet R.[14]
Gerasimov E.
7-647-66
Tiafoe F.[13]
Murray A.
7-646-3
Ymer M.
Ramos A.[11]
6-36-1
Purcell M.
Thompson J.
7-56-4
Fucsovics M.[4]
Watanuki Y.
7-56-1
Alcaraz C.[15]
Popyrin A.
6-796-17-61
Giron M.
Delbonis F.[10]
6-36-4
Herbert P.
Coria F.
6-46-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Bublik A.[5]
6-27-65
Paire B.[12]
Simon G.
6-36-3
Evans D.[3]
Pouille L.
3-66-46-1
Ivashka I.
Cilic M.[6]
4-67-56-4
Struff J.[9]
Mager G.
6-26-2
Koepfer D.[16]
Cecchinato M.
5-76-46-4
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Kwon S.
6-33-66-4
Monteiro T.
Nava E.
7-56-1
R64
Murray A.
Rubin N.
6-26-0
Gerasimov E.
Gombos N.
7-663-66-2
Monteiro T.
Duckworth J.
6-44-67-65
Ymer M.
Travaglia S.
6-21-66-2
Thompson J.
Pella G.
6-11-66-3
Watanuki Y.
Munar J.
3-66-36-0
Popyrin A.
Johnson S.
7-56-4
Ivashka I.
Seppi A.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Wu T.
7-656-3
Cecchinato M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-4
Kwon S.
Albot R.
6-27-5
Giron M.
Bagnis F.
7-56-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Kudla D.
6-36-4
Simon G.
Rinderknech A.
7-56-3
Pouille L.
Lopez F.
6-16-4
Coria F.
Musetti L.
6-44-66-4