Mikael Ymer vs Max Purcell — Winston-Salem Round of 16

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 16
SWE
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
hard
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
Ymer M.
7-5 6-2
Purcell M.
Ymer M.
762
Purcell M.
520

Mikael Ymer defeated Max Purcell 7-5 6-2 in the Winston-Salem round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mikael Ymer closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Purcell M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ymer M.Purcell M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.2
7.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer M.Purcell M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
71
59
Break points saved·Even
90
92
Break points won·Dominant
71
10
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
84
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ymer M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Purcell M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
6.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
4.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ivashka I.
Ymer M.
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Ymer M.
Alcaraz C.[15]
7-56-3
Ivashka I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Alcaraz C.[15]
Giron M.
7-626-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Gasquet R.[14]
7-656-1
Ivashka I.
Carreno Busta P.[1]
7-626-3
Ymer M.
Tiafoe F.[13]
6-726-26-3
R16
Tiafoe F.[13]
Monteiro T.
7-57-62
Ymer M.
Purcell M.
7-56-2
Alcaraz C.[15]
Fucsovics M.[4]
6-30-66-2
Giron M.
Herbert P.
4-66-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Paire B.[12]
6-44-66-1
Gasquet R.[14]
Evans D.[3]
6-47-64
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Koepfer D.[16]
6-26-3
Ivashka I.
Struff J.[9]
6-26-1
R32
Gasquet R.[14]
Gerasimov E.
7-647-66
Tiafoe F.[13]
Murray A.
7-646-3
Ymer M.
Ramos A.[11]
6-36-1
Purcell M.
Thompson J.
7-56-4
Fucsovics M.[4]
Watanuki Y.
7-56-1
Alcaraz C.[15]
Popyrin A.
6-796-17-61
Giron M.
Delbonis F.[10]
6-36-4
Herbert P.
Coria F.
6-46-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Bublik A.[5]
6-27-65
Paire B.[12]
Simon G.
6-36-3
Evans D.[3]
Pouille L.
3-66-46-1
Ivashka I.
Cilic M.[6]
4-67-56-4
Struff J.[9]
Mager G.
6-26-2
Koepfer D.[16]
Cecchinato M.
5-76-46-4
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Kwon S.
6-33-66-4
Monteiro T.
Nava E.
7-56-1
R64
Murray A.
Rubin N.
6-26-0
Gerasimov E.
Gombos N.
7-663-66-2
Monteiro T.
Duckworth J.
6-44-67-65
Ymer M.
Travaglia S.
6-21-66-2
Thompson J.
Pella G.
6-11-66-3
Watanuki Y.
Munar J.
3-66-36-0
Popyrin A.
Johnson S.
7-56-4
Ivashka I.
Seppi A.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Wu T.
7-656-3
Cecchinato M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-4
Kwon S.
Albot R.
6-27-5
Giron M.
Bagnis F.
7-56-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Kudla D.
6-36-4
Simon G.
Rinderknech A.
7-56-3
Pouille L.
Lopez F.
6-16-4
Coria F.
Musetti L.
6-44-66-4