Matija Pecotic vs Evgenii Tiurnev — Prague 3 CH Round of 32

Prague 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CRO
Matija Pecotic
#1882ATP
37 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
clay
RUS3
Evgenii Tiurnev
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Pecotic M.
7-6 6-2
Tiurnev E.
Pecotic M.
7862
Tiurnev E.
6620

Matija Pecotic defeated Evgenii Tiurnev 7-6 6-2 in the Prague 3 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pecotic M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tiurnev E.

Tiurnev E.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Pecotic M.

Serve advantage — Pecotic M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pecotic M.Tiurnev E.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.8
8.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 41). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pecotic M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tiurnev E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
2.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
8.5
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Agamenone F.
Peniston R.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Agamenone F.
Sijsling I.
6-36-0
Peniston R.
Olivieri G.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Sijsling I.
Uchida K.
7-56-3
Agamenone F.
Geerts M.[6]
5-77-56-3
Peniston R.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-1
Olivieri G.
Karlovskiy E.[1]
6-766-46-4
R16
Uchida K.
Ritschard A.[2]
7-647-5
Agamenone F.
Blancaneaux G.[4]
7-56-4
Peniston R.
Ignatik U.
6-22-66-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Pecotic M.
6-37-67
Karlovskiy E.[1]
Molleker R.
5-76-46-2
Olivieri G.
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Geerts M.[6]
Rybakov A.
6-26-2
Sijsling I.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-22-63-2
R32
Ritschard A.[2]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-1
Uchida K.
Chappell N.
6-43-66-1
Sijsling I.
Siniakov D.
6-46-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Jianu F.[7]
7-646-2
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Cazaux A.
6-47-66
Agamenone F.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-3
Geerts M.[6]
Krumich M.
6-26-4
Ignatik U.
Piros Z.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Donati M.
6-16-3
Pecotic M.
Tiurnev E.[3]
7-666-2
Olivieri G.
Forejtek J.[5]
6-26-4
Hsu Y.
Vatutin A.
6-36-0
Molleker R.
Paulson A.
7-54-66-1
Karlovskiy E.[1]
Casanova H.
6-26-3
Rybakov A.
Haerteis J.
6-46-2
Peniston R.
Zekic M.[8]
6-04-1