Ilya Ivashka vs Mikael Ymer — Winston-Salem Final

Winston-Salem · ATP · Final
Ilya Ivashka
BLR
Ilya Ivashka
#539ATP
1538ELO
1509Hard ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
hard
SWE
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
Ivashka I.
6-0 6-2
Ymer M.
Ivashka I.
662
Ymer M.
020

Ilya Ivashka defeated Mikael Ymer 6-0 6-2 in the Winston-Salem final on hard. The result followed the form book — Ilya Ivashka came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ilya Ivashka extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-09-26SofiaR32hardIlya Ivashka7-6(8) 4-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Ivashka I.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Ymer M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ivashka I.

Serve advantage — Ivashka I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ivashka I.Ymer M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.3
2.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (175 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ivashka I.Ymer M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
71
Break points saved·Even
93
90
Break points won·Dominant
41
71
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
15
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ivashka I.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ymer M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.9
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Ivashka I.
Ymer M.
6-06-2
Semi-finals
Ymer M.
Alcaraz C.[15]
7-56-3
Ivashka I.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Alcaraz C.[15]
Giron M.
7-626-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Gasquet R.[14]
7-656-1
Ivashka I.
Carreno Busta P.[1]
7-626-3
Ymer M.
Tiafoe F.[13]
6-726-26-3
R16
Tiafoe F.[13]
Monteiro T.
7-57-62
Ymer M.
Purcell M.
7-56-2
Alcaraz C.[15]
Fucsovics M.[4]
6-30-66-2
Giron M.
Herbert P.
4-66-36-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Paire B.[12]
6-44-66-1
Gasquet R.[14]
Evans D.[3]
6-47-64
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Koepfer D.[16]
6-26-3
Ivashka I.
Struff J.[9]
6-26-1
R32
Gasquet R.[14]
Gerasimov E.
7-647-66
Tiafoe F.[13]
Murray A.
7-646-3
Ymer M.
Ramos A.[11]
6-36-1
Purcell M.
Thompson J.
7-56-4
Fucsovics M.[4]
Watanuki Y.
7-56-1
Alcaraz C.[15]
Popyrin A.
6-796-17-61
Giron M.
Delbonis F.[10]
6-36-4
Herbert P.
Coria F.
6-46-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Bublik A.[5]
6-27-65
Paire B.[12]
Simon G.
6-36-3
Evans D.[3]
Pouille L.
3-66-46-1
Ivashka I.
Cilic M.[6]
4-67-56-4
Struff J.[9]
Mager G.
6-26-2
Koepfer D.[16]
Cecchinato M.
5-76-46-4
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Kwon S.
6-33-66-4
Monteiro T.
Nava E.
7-56-1
R64
Murray A.
Rubin N.
6-26-0
Gerasimov E.
Gombos N.
7-663-66-2
Monteiro T.
Duckworth J.
6-44-67-65
Ymer M.
Travaglia S.
6-21-66-2
Thompson J.
Pella G.
6-11-66-3
Watanuki Y.
Munar J.
3-66-36-0
Popyrin A.
Johnson S.
7-56-4
Ivashka I.
Seppi A.
6-46-4
Mager G.
Wu T.
7-656-3
Cecchinato M.
Sandgren T.
6-46-4
Kwon S.
Albot R.
6-27-5
Giron M.
Bagnis F.
7-56-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Kudla D.
6-36-4
Simon G.
Rinderknech A.
7-56-3
Pouille L.
Lopez F.
6-16-4
Coria F.
Musetti L.
6-44-66-4