Uladzimir Ignatik vs Zsombor Piros — Prague 3 CH Round of 32

Prague 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BLR
Uladzimir Ignatik
#1413ATP
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
clay
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Ignatik U.
6-4 6-3
Piros Z.
Ignatik U.
662
Piros Z.
430

Uladzimir Ignatik defeated Zsombor Piros 6-4 6-3 in the Prague 3 CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ignatik U.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ignatik U.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ignatik U.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.0
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ignatik U.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
57
Break points saved·Dominant
53
84
Break points won·Dominant
6
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
2
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
6
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ignatik U.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Piros Z.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 658 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
7.8
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ignatik U.Piros Z.
Freshness·
—
48

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Agamenone F.
Peniston R.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Agamenone F.
Sijsling I.
6-36-0
Peniston R.
Olivieri G.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Sijsling I.
Uchida K.
7-56-3
Agamenone F.
Geerts M.[6]
5-77-56-3
Peniston R.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-1
Olivieri G.
Karlovskiy E.[1]
6-766-46-4
R16
Uchida K.
Ritschard A.[2]
7-647-5
Agamenone F.
Blancaneaux G.[4]
7-56-4
Peniston R.
Ignatik U.
6-22-66-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Pecotic M.
6-37-67
Karlovskiy E.[1]
Molleker R.
5-76-46-2
Olivieri G.
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Geerts M.[6]
Rybakov A.
6-26-2
Sijsling I.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-22-63-2
R32
Ritschard A.[2]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-1
Uchida K.
Chappell N.
6-43-66-1
Sijsling I.
Siniakov D.
6-46-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Jianu F.[7]
7-646-2
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Cazaux A.
6-47-66
Agamenone F.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-3
Geerts M.[6]
Krumich M.
6-26-4
Ignatik U.
Piros Z.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Donati M.
6-16-3
Pecotic M.
Tiurnev E.[3]
7-666-2
Olivieri G.
Forejtek J.[5]
6-26-4
Hsu Y.
Vatutin A.
6-36-0
Molleker R.
Paulson A.
7-54-66-1
Karlovskiy E.[1]
Casanova H.
6-26-3
Rybakov A.
Haerteis J.
6-46-2
Peniston R.
Zekic M.[8]
6-04-1