Ryan Peniston vs Uladzimir Ignatik — Prague 3 CH Round of 16

Prague 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Ryan Peniston
GBR
Ryan Peniston
#417ATP
1441ELO
1357Clay ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
clay
BLR
Uladzimir Ignatik
#1413ATP
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Peniston R.
6-2 2-6 6-3
Ignatik U.
Peniston R.
6262
Ignatik U.
2631

Ryan Peniston defeated Uladzimir Ignatik 6-2 2-6 6-3 in the Prague 3 CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Ryan Peniston closed it out in three sets, 6–2 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peniston R.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ignatik U.

Ignatik U.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Peniston R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peniston R.Ignatik U.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
6.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peniston R.Ignatik U.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
20
0
Break points saved·Slight edge
60
53
Break points won·Clear edge
25
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
2
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
15
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peniston R.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Ignatik U.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Agamenone F.
Peniston R.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Agamenone F.
Sijsling I.
6-36-0
Peniston R.
Olivieri G.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Sijsling I.
Uchida K.
7-56-3
Agamenone F.
Geerts M.[6]
5-77-56-3
Peniston R.
Diaz Acosta F.
6-36-1
Olivieri G.
Karlovskiy E.[1]
6-766-46-4
R16
Uchida K.
Ritschard A.[2]
7-647-5
Agamenone F.
Blancaneaux G.[4]
7-56-4
Peniston R.
Ignatik U.
6-22-66-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Pecotic M.
6-37-67
Karlovskiy E.[1]
Molleker R.
5-76-46-2
Olivieri G.
Hsu Y.
6-36-4
Geerts M.[6]
Rybakov A.
6-26-2
Sijsling I.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-22-63-2
R32
Ritschard A.[2]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-16-1
Uchida K.
Chappell N.
6-43-66-1
Sijsling I.
Siniakov D.
6-46-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Jianu F.[7]
7-646-2
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Cazaux A.
6-47-66
Agamenone F.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-36-3
Geerts M.[6]
Krumich M.
6-26-4
Ignatik U.
Piros Z.
6-46-3
Diaz Acosta F.
Donati M.
6-16-3
Pecotic M.
Tiurnev E.[3]
7-666-2
Olivieri G.
Forejtek J.[5]
6-26-4
Hsu Y.
Vatutin A.
6-36-0
Molleker R.
Paulson A.
7-54-66-1
Karlovskiy E.[1]
Casanova H.
6-26-3
Rybakov A.
Haerteis J.
6-46-2
Peniston R.
Zekic M.[8]
6-04-1