Anett Kontaveit vs Caroline Garcia — Cleveland Round of 16

Cleveland · WTA · Round of 16
EST2
Anett Kontaveit
30 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
hard
FRA
Caroline Garcia
#772WTA
32 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Kontaveit A.
6-3 6-3
Garcia C.
Kontaveit A.
662
Garcia C.
330

Anett Kontaveit defeated Caroline Garcia 6-3 6-3 in the Cleveland round of 16 on hard. Anett Kontaveit extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-28Roland GarrosR128clayCaroline Garcia6-4 3-6 6-4
2020-09-14RomeR64clayAnett Kontaveit6-3 7-6(1)
2019-04-22StuttgartR32clayAnett Kontaveit6-4 6-3
2016-10-17LuxembourgR32hardCaroline Garcia7-6(2) 2-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kontaveit A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Garcia C.

Garcia C.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kontaveit A.

Serve advantage — Kontaveit A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kontaveit A.Garcia C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
44%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
6.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kontaveit A.Garcia C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
82
72
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
91
Break points won·Dominant
91
50
Deciding sets·Even
90
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
77
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kontaveit A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Garcia C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
6.6
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kontaveit A.[2]
Begu I.
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Kontaveit A.[2]
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
6-46-4
Begu I.
Linette M.[6]
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Linette M.[6]
Kasatkina D.[1]
6-16-2
Begu I.
Sasnovich A.
6-26-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Zhang S.[9]
6-36-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Siniakova K.
6-35-76-2
R16
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Zvonareva V.
W/O
Sasnovich A.
Podoroska N.[5]
6-776-46-4
Kasatkina D.[1]
Mcnally C.
2-66-46-2
Linette M.[6]
Fruhvirtova L.
7-626-4
Begu I.
Hercog P.
7-657-5
Siniakova K.
Hanatani N.
6-06-0
Zhang S.[9]
Mattek Sands B.
6-47-67
Kontaveit A.[2]
Garcia C.
6-36-3
R32
Hanatani N.
Blinkova A.
1-0
Siniakova K.
Rogers S.[8]
7-56-1
Hercog P.
Mateas M.
6-36-2
Mattek Sands B.
Shibahara E.
6-43-66-1
Fruhvirtova L.
Moore T.
6-47-5
Kasatkina D.[1]
Juvan K.
6-36-3
Mcnally C.
Danilina A.
7-645-76-4
Linette M.[6]
Bektas E.
7-666-4
Begu I.
Alexandrova E.[3]
7-636-3
Sasnovich A.
Mchale C.
6-47-5
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Glatch A.
6-26-1
Zvonareva V.
Eikeri U.
6-46-2
Zhang S.[9]
Trevisan M.
7-56-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Davis L.
1-66-06-0
Garcia C.
Harrison C.
6-16-2
Podoroska N.[5]
Pera B.
6-26-4