Anett Kontaveit vs Lauren Davis — Cleveland Round of 32

Cleveland · WTA · Round of 32
EST2
Anett Kontaveit
30 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
hard
USA
Lauren Davis
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Kontaveit A.
1-6 6-0 6-0
Davis L.
Kontaveit A.
1662
Davis L.
6001

Anett Kontaveit defeated Lauren Davis 1-6 6-0 6-0 in the Cleveland round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Anett Kontaveit came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Anett Kontaveit extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-06-06NottinghamR32grassAnett Kontaveit6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Kontaveit A.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Davis L.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kontaveit A.

Serve advantage — Kontaveit A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kontaveit A.Davis L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
56%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
51%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
1.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kontaveit A.Davis L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
82
51
Break points saved·Dominant
85
26
Break points won·Clear edge
91
79
Deciding sets·Even
90
86
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
77
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kontaveit A.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Davis L.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
3.2
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kontaveit A.[2]
Begu I.
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Kontaveit A.[2]
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
6-46-4
Begu I.
Linette M.[6]
7-656-2
Quarter-finals
Linette M.[6]
Kasatkina D.[1]
6-16-2
Begu I.
Sasnovich A.
6-26-4
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Zhang S.[9]
6-36-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Siniakova K.
6-35-76-2
R16
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Zvonareva V.
W/O
Sasnovich A.
Podoroska N.[5]
6-776-46-4
Kasatkina D.[1]
Mcnally C.
2-66-46-2
Linette M.[6]
Fruhvirtova L.
7-626-4
Begu I.
Hercog P.
7-657-5
Siniakova K.
Hanatani N.
6-06-0
Zhang S.[9]
Mattek Sands B.
6-47-67
Kontaveit A.[2]
Garcia C.
6-36-3
R32
Hanatani N.
Blinkova A.
1-0
Siniakova K.
Rogers S.[8]
7-56-1
Hercog P.
Mateas M.
6-36-2
Mattek Sands B.
Shibahara E.
6-43-66-1
Fruhvirtova L.
Moore T.
6-47-5
Kasatkina D.[1]
Juvan K.
6-36-3
Mcnally C.
Danilina A.
7-645-76-4
Linette M.[6]
Bektas E.
7-666-4
Begu I.
Alexandrova E.[3]
7-636-3
Sasnovich A.
Mchale C.
6-47-5
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Glatch A.
6-26-1
Zvonareva V.
Eikeri U.
6-46-2
Zhang S.[9]
Trevisan M.
7-56-1
Kontaveit A.[2]
Davis L.
1-66-06-0
Garcia C.
Harrison C.
6-16-2
Podoroska N.[5]
Pera B.
6-26-4