Javier Barranco Cosano vs Lukas Klein — Warsaw CH Quarter-final

Warsaw CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1441Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 August 2021
clay
Lukas Klein
SVK3
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1624Clay ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
Barranco Cosano J.
3-6 6-3 6-4
Klein L.
Barranco Cosano J.
3662
Klein L.
6341

Javier Barranco Cosano defeated Lukas Klein 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the Warsaw CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barranco Cosano J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Klein L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barranco Cosano J.Klein L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.1
5.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barranco Cosano J.Klein L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
14
39
Break points saved·Clear edge
70
92
Break points won·Dominant
33
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
63
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
7
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barranco Cosano J.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Klein L.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Clay Elo 1441
Surface ELO
7.3+183 Clay Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1457
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1601
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
5.4
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ugo Carabelli C.
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Ugo Carabelli C.
Barranco Cosano J.
3-66-47-60
Serdarusic N.
Kovalik J.[2]
7-637-66
Quarter-finals
Kovalik J.[2]
Miedler L.
6-46-4
Serdarusic N.
Vrbensky M.
7-616-2
Barranco Cosano J.
Klein L.[3]
3-66-36-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Jarry N.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Kovalik J.[2]
Furness E.
6-27-5
Miedler L.
Kielan S.
7-56-4
Serdarusic N.
Lamasine T.[4]
6-13-67-5
Vrbensky M.
Vanneste J.
6-04-66-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Borges N.
3-66-26-3
Jarry N.[6]
Kicker N.
7-614-66-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-47-62
Klein L.[3]
Kuznetsov A.
7-56-1
R32
Klein L.[3]
Lenz J.
6-13-66-3
Kovalik J.[2]
Nikles J.
6-36-4
Furness E.
Luz O.
6-42-66-3
Kielan S.
Oliveira G.
7-56-0
Miedler L.
Ajdukovic D.[5]
6-33-66-1
Vanneste J.
Shevchenko A.
6-32-67-5
Vrbensky M.
Sachko V.[7]
2-67-646-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Basic M.[8]
6-36-1
Kuznetsov A.
Durasovic V.
6-06-2
Jarry N.[6]
Menendez Maceiras A.
7-54-66-1
Kicker N.
Erler A.
2-67-56-3
Ugo Carabelli C.
Kasnikowski M.
6-26-4
Borges N.
Catarina L.
6-37-5
Serdarusic N.
Michalski D.
6-36-4
Lamasine T.[4]
Zielinski J.
6-26-2
Altmaier D.[1]
Borg L.
0-2