Holger Rune vs Carlos Taberner — Verona CH Semi-final

Verona CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Holger Rune
DEN4
Holger Rune
#81ATP
1757ELO
1729Clay ELO
$0YTD
$16MCAREER
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 August 2021
clay
Carlos Taberner
ESP1
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
Rune H.
6-2 6-1
Taberner C.
Rune H.
662
Taberner C.
210

Holger Rune defeated Carlos Taberner 6-2 6-1 in the Verona CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Holger Rune came in ranked #81.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rune H.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Rune H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rune H.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
1.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rune H.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
91
53
Break points saved·Dominant
99
74
Break points won·Dominant
84
59
Deciding sets·Clear edge
98
75
Tiebreaks·Dominant
99
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rune H.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Taberner C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+124 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Clay Elo 1605
7.1Overall Elo 1757
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1610
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.5
Surface form
5.8
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[4]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Serdarusic N.
Clarke J.[5]
6-16-1
Rune H.[4]
Taberner C.[1]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Clarke J.[5]
Popko D.[2]
3-66-47-5
Serdarusic N.
Elias G.[8]
4-66-36-0
Rune H.[4]
Bonadio R.
6-36-2
Taberner C.[1]
Janvier M.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Popko D.[2]
Zeppieri G.
7-52-66-2
Clarke J.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Serdarusic N.
Lorenzi P.[3]
6-36-1
Elias G.[8]
Forti F.
6-26-4
Bonadio R.
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Rune H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-3
Janvier M.[6]
Gabashvili T.
6-26-2
Taberner C.[1]
Kotov P.
6-24-66-1
R32
Popko D.[2]
Luz O.
6-36-1
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
6-20-66-4
Clarke J.[5]
Mejia N.
6-36-4
Lorenzi P.[3]
Oliveira G.
6-36-3
Serdarusic N.
Baldi F.
6-36-2
Forti F.
Scott F.
6-17-5
Elias G.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4
Bonadio R.
Giustino L.[7]
4-66-46-4
Fatic N.
Viola M.
6-06-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Jaziri M.
6-46-1
Janvier M.[6]
Guinard M.
6-46-747-66
Gabashvili T.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-736-27-64
Kotov P.
Bortolotti M.
6-36-3
Taberner C.[1]
De Jong J.
6-37-61
Rune H.[4]
Pecotic M.
6-27-63
Zeppieri G.
Sachko V.
1-67-56-2