Roberto Quiroz vs Chun Hsin Tseng — Verona CH Round of 32

Verona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU
Roberto Quiroz
34 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 August 2021
clay
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Quiroz R.
6-2 0-6 6-4
Tseng C.
Quiroz R.
6062
Tseng C.
2641

Roberto Quiroz defeated Chun Hsin Tseng 6-2 0-6 6-4 in the Verona CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Roberto Quiroz closed it out in three sets, 6–2 0–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Quiroz R.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Tseng C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Quiroz R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Quiroz R.Tseng C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.4
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Quiroz R.Tseng C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
14
26
Break points saved·Even
80
83
Break points won·Slight edge
7
15
Deciding sets·Clear edge
15
31
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
14
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Quiroz R.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tseng C.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
4.8
0.0Lost last 9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[4]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Serdarusic N.
Clarke J.[5]
6-16-1
Rune H.[4]
Taberner C.[1]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Clarke J.[5]
Popko D.[2]
3-66-47-5
Serdarusic N.
Elias G.[8]
4-66-36-0
Rune H.[4]
Bonadio R.
6-36-2
Taberner C.[1]
Janvier M.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Popko D.[2]
Zeppieri G.
7-52-66-2
Clarke J.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Serdarusic N.
Lorenzi P.[3]
6-36-1
Elias G.[8]
Forti F.
6-26-4
Bonadio R.
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Rune H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-3
Janvier M.[6]
Gabashvili T.
6-26-2
Taberner C.[1]
Kotov P.
6-24-66-1
R32
Popko D.[2]
Luz O.
6-36-1
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
6-20-66-4
Clarke J.[5]
Mejia N.
6-36-4
Lorenzi P.[3]
Oliveira G.
6-36-3
Serdarusic N.
Baldi F.
6-36-2
Forti F.
Scott F.
6-17-5
Elias G.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4
Bonadio R.
Giustino L.[7]
4-66-46-4
Fatic N.
Viola M.
6-06-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Jaziri M.
6-46-1
Janvier M.[6]
Guinard M.
6-46-747-66
Gabashvili T.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-736-27-64
Kotov P.
Bortolotti M.
6-36-3
Taberner C.[1]
De Jong J.
6-37-61
Rune H.[4]
Pecotic M.
6-27-63
Zeppieri G.
Sachko V.
1-67-56-2