Carlos Taberner vs Pavel Kotov — Verona CH Round of 16

Verona CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Carlos Taberner
ESP1
Carlos Taberner
#194ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 August 2021
clay
Pavel Kotov
RUS
Pavel Kotov
#249ATP
1597ELO
1529Clay ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Taberner C.
6-2 4-6 6-1
Kotov P.
Taberner C.
6462
Kotov P.
2611

Carlos Taberner defeated Pavel Kotov 6-2 4-6 6-1 in the Verona CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Carlos Taberner came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–2 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kotov P.

Kotov P.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Kotov P.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
4.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Kotov P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
59
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
94
Break points won·Dominant
59
13
Deciding sets·Slight edge
75
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Taberner C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kotov P.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+76 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Clay Elo 1529
4.5Overall Elo 1610
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1597
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
3.3
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.[4]
Serdarusic N.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Serdarusic N.
Clarke J.[5]
6-16-1
Rune H.[4]
Taberner C.[1]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Clarke J.[5]
Popko D.[2]
3-66-47-5
Serdarusic N.
Elias G.[8]
4-66-36-0
Rune H.[4]
Bonadio R.
6-36-2
Taberner C.[1]
Janvier M.[6]
6-26-2
R16
Popko D.[2]
Zeppieri G.
7-52-66-2
Clarke J.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-46-4
Serdarusic N.
Lorenzi P.[3]
6-36-1
Elias G.[8]
Forti F.
6-26-4
Bonadio R.
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Rune H.[4]
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-26-3
Janvier M.[6]
Gabashvili T.
6-26-2
Taberner C.[1]
Kotov P.
6-24-66-1
R32
Popko D.[2]
Luz O.
6-36-1
Quiroz R.
Tseng C.
6-20-66-4
Clarke J.[5]
Mejia N.
6-36-4
Lorenzi P.[3]
Oliveira G.
6-36-3
Serdarusic N.
Baldi F.
6-36-2
Forti F.
Scott F.
6-17-5
Elias G.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
6-26-4
Bonadio R.
Giustino L.[7]
4-66-46-4
Fatic N.
Viola M.
6-06-1
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Jaziri M.
6-46-1
Janvier M.[6]
Guinard M.
6-46-747-66
Gabashvili T.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-736-27-64
Kotov P.
Bortolotti M.
6-36-3
Taberner C.[1]
De Jong J.
6-37-61
Rune H.[4]
Pecotic M.
6-27-63
Zeppieri G.
Sachko V.
1-67-56-2