Ons Jabeur vs Iga Swiatek — Cincinnati Round of 32

Cincinnati · WTA · Round of 32
TUN
Ons Jabeur
#1217WTA
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 August 2021
hard
Iga Swiatek
POL6
Iga Swiatek
#3WTA
2064ELO
2022Hard ELO
$2.0MYTD
$46MCAREER
25 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWLW
Jabeur O.
6-3 6-3
Swiatek I.
Jabeur O.
662
Swiatek I.
330

Ons Jabeur defeated Iga Swiatek 6-3 6-3 in the Cincinnati round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Iga Swiatek came in ranked #3, leading the head-to-head 5–1, defending last year's round of 64, but Ons Jabeur had arrived on a 3-match winning run. Ons Jabeur narrowed the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-10-30Cancun FinalsRRhardIga Swiatek6-1 6-2
2023-04-17StuttgartSFclayIga Swiatek3-0 RET
2022-08-29US OpenFhardIga Swiatek6-2 7-6(5)
2022-05-09RomeFclayIga Swiatek6-2 6-2
2021-06-28WimbledonR16grassOns Jabeur5-7 6-1 6-1
2019-07-29WashingtonR32hardIga Swiatek4-6 6-4 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Jabeur O.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Swiatek I.

Swiatek I.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Serve advantage — Swiatek I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Jabeur O.Swiatek I.
—
Serve
67
—
Return
98

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Jabeur O.Swiatek I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
45%
48%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jabeur O.Swiatek I.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
90
100
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
98
Break points won·Even
96
100
Deciding sets·Even
95
99
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jabeur O.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Swiatek I.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 23 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.2
Surface form
6.4
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
4.7
Country comfort
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jabeur O.Swiatek I.
Freshness·
—
89

Swiatek I.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 21 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
23°CDrizzle
Wind 1 km/hHumidity 86%

Draw

Final
Barty A.[1]
Teichmann J.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Teichmann J.
Pliskova K.[5]
6-26-4
Barty A.[1]
Kerber A.
6-27-5
Quarter-finals
Pliskova K.[5]
Badosa P.
7-52-0
Barty A.[1]
Krejcikova B.[9]
6-26-4
Teichmann J.
Bencic B.[10]
6-36-2
Kerber A.
Kvitova P.[11]
6-43-3
R16
Bencic B.[10]
Muchova K.
7-52-1
Pliskova K.[5]
Pegula J.
6-47-65
Barty A.[1]
Azarenka V.[14]
6-06-2
Krejcikova B.[9]
Muguruza G.[8]
6-16-756-2
Kerber A.
Ostapenko J.
4-66-27-5
Kvitova P.[11]
Jabeur O.
6-16-2
Badosa P.
Rybakina E.
6-27-65
Teichmann J.
Osaka N.[2]
3-66-36-3
R32
Pegula J.
Halep S.[12]
W/O
Kvitova P.[11]
Kudermetova V.
6-26-4
Pliskova K.[5]
Putintseva Y.
6-36-2
Badosa P.
Sabalenka A.[3]
5-76-27-64
Muchova K.
Andreescu B.[7]
6-46-2
Bencic B.[10]
Rogers S.
7-616-1
Ostapenko J.
Brady J.[13]
6-725-4
Teichmann J.
Pera B.
6-16-4
Osaka N.[2]
Gauff C.
4-66-36-4
Muguruza G.[8]
Garcia C.
6-46-3
Barty A.[1]
Watson H.
6-47-63
Azarenka V.[14]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-27-5
Krejcikova B.[9]
Yastremska D.
6-17-65
Kerber A.
Svitolina E.[4]
7-52-66-4
Jabeur O.
Swiatek I.[6]
6-36-3
Rybakina E.
Mertens E.[15]
6-36-2
R64
Yastremska D.
Mcnally C.
7-637-61
Azarenka V.[14]
Samsonova L.
6-26-3
Riske Amritraj A.
Fernandez L.
6-26-2
Watson H.
Sasnovich A.
6-23-66-1
Kvitova P.[11]
Keys M.
7-56-4
Pegula J.
Giorgi C.
6-26-2
Kerber A.
Sakkari M.
6-26-2
Ostapenko J.
Zidansek T.
7-56-1
Brady J.[13]
Alexandrova E.
6-37-63
Kudermetova V.
Paolini J.
6-36-2
Putintseva Y.
Zhang S.
6-26-0
Halep S.[12]
Linette M.
6-43-66-1
Badosa P.
Martic P.
4-66-47-69
Mertens E.[15]
Podoroska N.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.
Stosur S.
6-36-3
Rogers S.
Collins D.
6-42-1
Muchova K.
Konta J.
3-67-656-2
Garcia C.
Stephens S.
7-674-66-4
Krejcikova B.[9]
Kasatkina D.
6-36-2
Bencic B.[10]
Vondrousova M.
6-37-5
Pera B.
Peterson R.
6-46-1
Gauff C.
Hsieh S.
6-16-2
Jabeur O.
Kontaveit A.
6-24-67-5
Teichmann J.
Cirstea S.
6-26-0