Ilya Ivashka vs Mitchell Krueger — Cincinnati Masters Qualifying Round 1
Cincinnati Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 August 2021
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScoreForm & Matchup
5.5+38 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO4.5Hard Elo 1465
5.6Overall Elo 1533
ELO gap4.4Overall Elo 1493
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
5.3
Surface form7.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Minutes 14d8.1
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match8.0
4.9
Country comfort7.2
Context
5.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Ivashka I.
6362
Krueger M.
3631
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
1.11
SlowFast
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form63%1st serve in+3%66%
65%1st serve points won+5%70%
46%2nd serve points won46%
58%Service points won+4%62%
41%Return points won+3%38%
59%Break points saved+3%62%
2.8Aces / match2.8
2.9Double faults / match+0.92
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw — qualifying
Q2
Anderson K.
Johnson S.
7-636-4
Giron M.[8]
Koepfer D.[5]
7-666-4
Gasquet R.[1]
Munar J.[10]
5-76-46-4
Alcaraz C.[2]
Ivashka I.[9]
6-36-4
Moutet C.
Popyrin A.[14]
3-67-627-5
Paul T.[3]
Sandgren T.
6-757-646-3
Nishioka Y.[4]
Berankis R.
6-767-56-2
Q1
Johnson S.
Ruusuvuori E.[13]
6-746-26-3
Sandgren T.
Chardy J.[11]
7-666-1
Popyrin A.[14]
Sock J.
4-2
Alcaraz C.[2]
Monteiro T.
6-26-3
Giron M.[8]
Wolf J.
6-36-3
Berankis R.
Mager G.[12]
6-47-5
Moutet C.
Pospisil V.[6]
6-26-2
Gasquet R.[1]
Verdasco F.
6-46-0
Munar J.[10]
Gombos N.
6-26-2
Koepfer D.[5]
Seppi A.
2-66-46-4
Paul T.[3]
Kwon S.
6-36-2
Anderson K.
Musetti L.[7]
6-36-3
Nishioka Y.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-26-3
Ivashka I.[9]
Krueger M.
6-33-66-3