Naomi Osaka vs Coco Gauff — Cincinnati Round of 32

Cincinnati · WTA · Round of 32
JPN
Naomi Osaka
[2]
#16WTA
1956ELO
1906Hard ELO
$674kYTD
$25MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
WWLWWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 August 2021
hard
USA
Coco Gauff
#4WTA
2102ELO
2050Hard ELO
$2.7MYTD
$32MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10
WWLWWWWLWW

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Osaka N.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 23 days (−0.3)
Gauff C.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
3.3Hard Elo 1906
Surface ELO
6.7+144 Hard Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1956
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 2102
0.0
H2H
10.0
7.8
Surface form
6.3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.1
6.3
Country comfort
5.2
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Osaka N.
4662
Gauff C.
6341

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
1.11
SlowFast

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-08-25US OpenR16hardNaomi Osaka6-3 6-2
2024-09-25BeijingR16hardCoco Gauff3-6 6-4 0-0 RET
2022-08-01San JoseR16hardCoco Gauff6-4 6-4
2020-01-20Australian OpenR32hardCoco Gauff6-3 6-4
2019-08-26US OpenR32hardNaomi Osaka6-3 6-0
View full head-to-head →

Statistics

Recent form
Osaka N.Gauff C.
60%1st serve in+4%64%
72%1st serve points won+5%67%
49%2nd serve points won+9%40%
63%Service points won+6%57%
43%Return points won+4%47%
61%Break points saved+6%55%
6.8Aces / match+3.83
2.5Double faults / match+4.57

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Barty A.[1]
Teichmann J.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Barty A.[1]
Kerber A.
6-27-5
Teichmann J.
Pliskova K.[5]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Barty A.[1]
Krejcikova B.[9]
6-26-4
Kerber A.
Kvitova P.[11]
6-43-3
Pliskova K.[5]
Badosa P.
7-52-0
Teichmann J.
Bencic B.[10]
6-36-2
R16
Bencic B.[10]
Muchova K.
7-52-1
Barty A.[1]
Azarenka V.[14]
6-06-2
Krejcikova B.[9]
Muguruza G.[8]
6-16-756-2
Kerber A.
Ostapenko J.
4-66-27-5
Kvitova P.[11]
Jabeur O.
6-16-2
Badosa P.
Rybakina E.
6-27-65
Teichmann J.
Osaka N.[2]
3-66-36-3
Pliskova K.[5]
Pegula J.
6-47-65
R32
Pegula J.
Halep S.[12]
W/O
Teichmann J.
Pera B.
6-16-4
Barty A.[1]
Watson H.
6-47-63
Azarenka V.[14]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-27-5
Krejcikova B.[9]
Yastremska D.
6-17-65
Kerber A.
Svitolina E.[4]
7-52-66-4
Ostapenko J.
Brady J.[13]
6-725-4
Jabeur O.
Swiatek I.[6]
6-36-3
Rybakina E.
Mertens E.[15]
6-36-2
Badosa P.
Sabalenka A.[3]
5-76-27-64
Muchova K.
Andreescu B.[7]
6-46-2
Osaka N.[2]
Gauff C.
4-66-36-4
Pliskova K.[5]
Putintseva Y.
6-36-2
Muguruza G.[8]
Garcia C.
6-46-3
Kvitova P.[11]
Kudermetova V.
6-26-4
Bencic B.[10]
Rogers S.
7-616-1
R64
Krejcikova B.[9]
Kasatkina D.
6-36-2
Kvitova P.[11]
Keys M.
7-56-4
Muchova K.
Konta J.
3-67-656-2
Watson H.
Sasnovich A.
6-23-66-1
Riske Amritraj A.
Fernandez L.
6-26-2
Yastremska D.
Mcnally C.
7-637-61
Garcia C.
Stephens S.
7-674-66-4
Kerber A.
Sakkari M.
6-26-2
Ostapenko J.
Zidansek T.
7-56-1
Brady J.[13]
Alexandrova E.
6-37-63
Kudermetova V.
Paolini J.
6-36-2
Putintseva Y.
Zhang S.
6-26-0
Pegula J.
Giorgi C.
6-26-2
Halep S.[12]
Linette M.
6-43-66-1
Mertens E.[15]
Podoroska N.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.
Stosur S.
6-36-3
Badosa P.
Martic P.
4-66-47-69
Rogers S.
Collins D.
6-42-1
Bencic B.[10]
Vondrousova M.
6-37-5
Pera B.
Peterson R.
6-46-1
Gauff C.
Hsieh S.
6-16-2
Azarenka V.[14]
Samsonova L.
6-26-3
Jabeur O.
Kontaveit A.
6-24-67-5
Teichmann J.
Cirstea S.
6-26-0