Ashleigh Barty vs Jil Teichmann — Cincinnati Final
Cincinnati · WTA · Final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 August 2021
hard
#119WTA
1687ELO
1631Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Barty A.6-3 6-1
Teichmann J.
Barty A.
662
Teichmann J.
310
Ashleigh Barty defeated Jil Teichmann 6-3 6-1 in the Cincinnati final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jil Teichmann came in defending last year's round of 32.
Key context
- Match story: Ashleigh Barty dropped just 4 games past Jil Teichmann.
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Barty A.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
75%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.8
2.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (59 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
90
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
71
Break points won·Slight edge
92
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
32
Tiebreaks·Even
90
90
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
7.1
Surface form5.6
0.0
Win streak0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.4
Country comfortContext
5.0
Defending pts6.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
23°CDrizzle
Wind 1 km/hHumidity 86%
Draw
Final
Barty A.[1]
Teichmann J.
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Pliskova K.[5]
Badosa P.
7-52-0
Barty A.[1]
Krejcikova B.[9]
6-26-4
Teichmann J.
Bencic B.[10]
6-36-2
Kerber A.
Kvitova P.[11]
6-43-3
R16
Bencic B.[10]
Muchova K.
7-52-1
Pliskova K.[5]
Pegula J.
6-47-65
Barty A.[1]
Azarenka V.[14]
6-06-2
Krejcikova B.[9]
Muguruza G.[8]
6-16-756-2
Kerber A.
Ostapenko J.
4-66-27-5
Kvitova P.[11]
Jabeur O.
6-16-2
Badosa P.
Rybakina E.
6-27-65
Teichmann J.
Osaka N.[2]
3-66-36-3
R32
Pegula J.
Halep S.[12]
W/O
Kvitova P.[11]
Kudermetova V.
6-26-4
Pliskova K.[5]
Putintseva Y.
6-36-2
Badosa P.
Sabalenka A.[3]
5-76-27-64
Muchova K.
Andreescu B.[7]
6-46-2
Bencic B.[10]
Rogers S.
7-616-1
Ostapenko J.
Brady J.[13]
6-725-4
Teichmann J.
Pera B.
6-16-4
Osaka N.[2]
Gauff C.
4-66-36-4
Muguruza G.[8]
Garcia C.
6-46-3
Barty A.[1]
Watson H.
6-47-63
Azarenka V.[14]
Riske Amritraj A.
6-27-5
Krejcikova B.[9]
Yastremska D.
6-17-65
Kerber A.
Svitolina E.[4]
7-52-66-4
Jabeur O.
Swiatek I.[6]
6-36-3
Rybakina E.
Mertens E.[15]
6-36-2
R64
Yastremska D.
Mcnally C.
7-637-61
Azarenka V.[14]
Samsonova L.
6-26-3
Riske Amritraj A.
Fernandez L.
6-26-2
Watson H.
Sasnovich A.
6-23-66-1
Kvitova P.[11]
Keys M.
7-56-4
Pegula J.
Giorgi C.
6-26-2
Kerber A.
Sakkari M.
6-26-2
Ostapenko J.
Zidansek T.
7-56-1
Brady J.[13]
Alexandrova E.
6-37-63
Kudermetova V.
Paolini J.
6-36-2
Putintseva Y.
Zhang S.
6-26-0
Halep S.[12]
Linette M.
6-43-66-1
Badosa P.
Martic P.
4-66-47-69
Mertens E.[15]
Podoroska N.
6-36-4
Rybakina E.
Stosur S.
6-36-3
Rogers S.
Collins D.
6-42-1
Muchova K.
Konta J.
3-67-656-2
Garcia C.
Stephens S.
7-674-66-4
Krejcikova B.[9]
Kasatkina D.
6-36-2
Bencic B.[10]
Vondrousova M.
6-37-5
Pera B.
Peterson R.
6-46-1
Gauff C.
Hsieh S.
6-16-2
Jabeur O.
Kontaveit A.
6-24-67-5
Teichmann J.
Cirstea S.
6-26-0