Camila Giorgi vs Jessica Pegula — Montreal Semi-final

Montreal · WTA · Semi-final
ITA
Camila Giorgi
34 yrs · 168 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 August 2021
hard
Jessica Pegula
USA
Jessica Pegula
#3WTA
2097ELO
2058Hard ELO
$2.8MYTD
$25MCAREER
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Giorgi C.
6-3 3-6 6-1
Pegula J.
Giorgi C.
6362
Pegula J.
3611

Camila Giorgi defeated Jessica Pegula 6-3 3-6 6-1 in the Montreal semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jessica Pegula came in leading the head-to-head 7–0. Camila Giorgi claimed a first win over Jessica Pegula in eight meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 7–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Camila Giorgi closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

0–7
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-08-28US OpenR128hardJessica Pegula6-2 6-2
2023-05-29Roland GarrosR64clayJessica Pegula6-2 0-0 RET
2023-03-06Indian WellsR64hardJessica Pegula3-6 6-1 6-2
2022-08-08TorontoR16hardJessica Pegula3-6 6-0 7-5
2022-04-28MadridR64clayJessica Pegula7-5 2-6 7-5
2021-08-16CincinnatiR64hardJessica Pegula6-2 6-2
2019-07-29WashingtonFhardJessica Pegula6-2 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Giorgi C.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Pegula J.

Pegula J.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Giorgi C.

Serve advantage — Pegula J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Giorgi C.Pegula J.
—
Serve
68
—
Return
73

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Giorgi C.Pegula J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Even
57%
61%
Return points won·Even
44%
45%
Break points saved·Even
54%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
6.8
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Giorgi C.Pegula J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
96
Break points saved·Dominant
71
96
Break points won·Clear edge
81
99
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
100
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
83
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Giorgi C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Pegula J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0
H2H
10.0
6.0
Surface form
5.5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Giorgi C.Pegula J.
Freshness·
—
79

Pegula J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 28 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 74%

Draw

Final
Giorgi C.
Pliskova K.[4]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Giorgi C.
Pegula J.
6-33-66-1
Pliskova K.[4]
Sabalenka A.[1]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Pegula J.
Jabeur O.[13]
1-67-646-0
Sabalenka A.[1]
Azarenka V.[8]
6-26-4
Pliskova K.[4]
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-46-0
Giorgi C.
Gauff C.[15]
6-47-62
R16
Gauff C.[15]
Konta J.
W/O
Giorgi C.
Kvitova P.[7]
6-46-4
Pegula J.
Collins D.
6-43-67-5
Jabeur O.[13]
Andreescu B.[2]
6-756-46-1
Sabalenka A.[1]
Marino R.
6-16-3
Azarenka V.[8]
Sakkari M.[11]
6-43-67-62
Pliskova K.[4]
Anisimova A.
6-17-68
Sorribes Tormo S.
Siniakova K.
6-746-06-3
R32
Sorribes Tormo S.
Samsonova L.
6-46-3
Azarenka V.[8]
Cirstea S.
6-26-2
Gauff C.[15]
Potapova A.
5-0
Andreescu B.[2]
Dart H.
6-13-66-3
Collins D.
Halep S.[6]
2-66-46-4
Sabalenka A.[1]
Stephens S.
7-644-66-4
Marino R.
Badosa P.
1-67-56-4
Sakkari M.[11]
Kudermetova V.
6-45-76-4
Pliskova K.[4]
Vekic D.
4-66-37-62
Anisimova A.
Dodin O.
6-36-3
Siniakova K.
Muguruza G.[5]
6-20-66-3
Kvitova P.[7]
Ferro F.
6-46-4
Giorgi C.
Podoroska N.
6-26-4
Konta J.
Svitolina E.[3]
3-66-36-2
Pegula J.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[10]
1-66-36-2
Jabeur O.[13]
Kasatkina D.
2-66-36-4
R64
Sakkari M.[11]
Bouzkova M.
6-43-1
Anisimova A.
Martincova T.
6-14-3
Badosa P.
Golubic V.
6-26-3
Marino R.
Keys M.[16]
6-36-3
Cirstea S.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-36-4
Vekic D.
Van Uytvanck A.
6-16-2
Pavlyuchenkova A.[10]
Garcia C.
6-46-4
Konta J.
Zhang S.
4-65-2
Giorgi C.
Mertens E.[9]
6-37-5
Gauff C.[15]
Sevastova A.
6-16-4
Potapova A.
Rogers S.
7-666-3
Collins D.
Teichmann J.
4-66-16-3
Pegula J.
Kontaveit A.
5-76-36-3
Kasatkina D.
Martic P.
7-56-3
Dodin O.
Muchova K.[14]
6-31-66-2
Samsonova L.
Rybakina E.[12]
6-45-76-4
Ferro F.
Tomljanovic A.
2-66-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Zhao C.
6-26-3
Siniakova K.
Ostapenko J.
6-16-3
Podoroska N.
Linette M.
6-16-2
Jabeur O.[13]
Burel C.
6-16-3
Dart H.
Fernandez L.
7-57-64
Stephens S.
Yastremska D.
6-41-66-4
Kudermetova V.
Putintseva Y.
1-66-26-4