Marius Copil vs Renzo Olivo — San Marino CH Round of 32

San Marino CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 August 2021
clay
Renzo Olivo
ARG
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Copil M.
7-6 6-4
Olivo R.
Copil M.
7762
Olivo R.
6440

Marius Copil defeated Renzo Olivo 7-6 6-4 in the San Marino CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Olivo R.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve advantage — Copil M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Olivo R.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
1.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Olivo R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
8
Break points saved·Dominant
91
33
Break points won·Clear edge
3
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Copil M.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Olivo R.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.3
Surface form
2.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.7
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
2.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Rune H.
Luz O.
1-66-26-3
Semi-finals
Luz O.
Dellien H.[4]
6-46-2
Rune H.
Cecchinato M.[1]
7-57-64
Quarter-finals
Rune H.
Menezes J.
6-07-5
Luz O.
Janvier M.
7-677-5
Dellien H.[4]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-36-2
Cecchinato M.[1]
Kotov P.
7-656-3
R16
Janvier M.
Simon G.[2]
7-56-1
Luz O.
Rola B.[8]
4-66-46-2
Dellien H.[4]
Copil M.
4-67-56-4
Rune H.
Caruso S.[3]
2-67-646-2
Kotov P.
Marcora R.
6-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Clarke J.
W/O
Menezes J.
Forti F.
6-727-627-69
Cecchinato M.[1]
Nardi L.
7-647-66
R32
Marcora R.
Pellegrino A.
7-667-61
Simon G.[2]
De Rossi M.
6-36-3
Janvier M.
Ocleppo J.
6-26-3
Dellien H.[4]
Mazza M.
6-47-5
Copil M.
Olivo R.
7-646-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Gojo B.
7-56-2
Clarke J.
Baez S.[7]
7-645-77-5
Forti F.
Moroni G.
4-66-37-5
Menezes J.
Elias G.
5-76-46-4
Rune H.
Cagnina J.
6-36-4
Caruso S.[3]
Halys Q.
3-66-26-2
Nardi L.
Brancaccio R.
6-46-4
Cecchinato M.[1]
Lorenzi P.
7-636-2
Rola B.[8]
Kolar Z.
6-36-3
Luz O.
Jaziri M.
6-34-2
Kotov P.
Gaio F.[5]
7-627-63