Marin Cilic vs Albert Ramos — Canada Masters Round of 64

Canada Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Marin Cilic
CRO
Marin Cilic
#88ATP
1800ELO
1762Hard ELO
$776kYTD
$33MCAREER
37 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 August 2021
hard
ESP
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1520Hard ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Cilic M.
6-2 4-6 6-3
Ramos A.
Cilic M.
6462
Ramos A.
2631

Marin Cilic defeated Albert Ramos 6-2 4-6 6-3 in the Canada Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Marin Cilic came in leading the head-to-head 7–3. Marin Cilic extended the head-to-head to 8–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Marin Cilic closed it out in three sets, 6–2 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

7–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-29US OpenR64hardMarin Cilic6-3 7-6(4) 6-3
2022-05-02Madrid MastersR64clayMarin Cilic6-3 3-6 6-4
2021-10-25St. PetersburgR32carpetMarin Cilic6-2 6-3
2019-10-07Shanghai MastersR64hardAlbert Ramos6-4 6-4
2017-10-09Shanghai MastersQFhardMarin Cilic6-3 6-4
2017-04-17Monte Carlo MastersQFclayAlbert Ramos6-2 6-7(5) 6-2
2016-01-18Australian OpenR64hardMarin Cilic6-4 6-3 7-6(4)
2013-03-07Indian Wells MastersR64hardMarin Cilic7-6(7) 6-2
2012-07-16HamburgQFclayMarin Cilic6-4 7-6(5)
2011-10-09Shanghai MastersR64hardAlbert Ramos6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Cilic M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cilic M.

Serve advantage — Cilic M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cilic M.Ramos A.
57
Serve
—
10
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cilic M.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
78%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.6
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cilic M.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
59
Break points saved·Even
99
95
Break points won·Slight edge
41
49
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cilic M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Ramos A.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+242 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Hard Elo 1520
8.2Overall Elo 1800
ELO gap
1.8Overall Elo 1558
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.9
Surface form
2.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.6
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cilic M.Ramos A.
Freshness·
100
—

Cilic M.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
29°CMainly clear
Wind 15 km/hHumidity 67%
Final
Medvedev D.[1]
Opelka R.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Opelka R.
Tsitsipas S.[3]
6-727-646-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Isner J.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Opelka R.
Bautista Agut R.[10]
6-37-61
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Ruud C.[6]
6-16-4
Isner J.
Monfils G.[11]
7-656-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Hurkacz H.[7]
2-67-667-65
R16
Opelka R.
Harris L.
4-67-667-64
Bautista Agut R.[10]
Schwartzman D.[8]
6-33-67-5
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Khachanov K.
6-36-2
Ruud C.[6]
Lajovic D.
6-46-3
Monfils G.[11]
Tiafoe F.
6-17-62
Isner J.
Rublev A.[4]
7-57-65
Hurkacz H.[7]
Basilashvili N.
6-776-46-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Duckworth J.
6-26-4
R32
Hurkacz H.[7]
Nishikori K.
W/O
Harris L.
Lopez F.
6-26-3
Opelka R.
Dimitrov G.[14]
6-36-4
Bautista Agut R.[10]
Paul T.
6-36-4
Schwartzman D.[8]
Paire B.
7-56-1
Tsitsipas S.[3]
Humbert U.
6-36-7136-1
Khachanov K.
Karatsev A.[15]
7-676-4
Lajovic D.
Auger Aliassime F.[9]
7-56-4
Ruud C.[6]
Cilic M.
6-33-66-3
Tiafoe F.
Shapovalov D.[5]
6-16-4
Monfils G.[11]
Millman J.
3-66-36-4
Isner J.
Garin C.[13]
4-66-36-4
Rublev A.[4]
Fognini F.
7-646-3
Basilashvili N.
De Minaur A.[12]
6-16-1
Duckworth J.
Sinner J.[16]
6-36-4
Medvedev D.[1]
Bublik A.
4-66-36-4
R64
Harris L.
Schnur B.
6-36-2
Opelka R.
Kyrgios N.
4-67-646-4
Paul T.
Pospisil V.
6-756-26-3
Paire B.
Mcdonald M.
6-36-4
Humbert U.
Sonego L.
6-36-4
Khachanov K.
Norrie C.
6-45-76-4
Lajovic D.
Ruusuvuori E.
3-66-36-3
Cilic M.
Ramos A.
6-24-66-3
Tiafoe F.
Nishioka Y.
6-46-3
Isner J.
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-46-1
Fognini F.
Struff J.
6-726-26-4
Nishikori K.
Kecmanovic M.
6-46-756-2
Basilashvili N.
Brooksby J.
2-66-06-4
Duckworth J.
Fritz T.
7-626-3
Bublik A.
Evans D.
6-46-4
Millman J.
Berankis R.
6-37-64