Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Meerbusch CH Semi-final

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ARG
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
[5]
#56ATP
1748ELO
1727Clay ELO
$422kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 August 2021
clay
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
[3]
#55ATP
1758ELO
1702Clay ELO
$537kYTD
$6.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWW

Juan Manuel Cerundolo defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 7-5 6-4 in the Meerbusch CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Juan Manuel Cerundolo came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Juan Manuel Cerundolo extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cerundolo J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Van De Zandschulp B.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6+25 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.4Clay Elo 1702
4.1Overall Elo 1748
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1758
10.0
H2H
0.0
3.1
Surface form
6.9
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
7.7
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Cerundolo J.
762
Van De Zandschulp B.
540

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-03-04Indian Wells MastersR128hardJuan Manuel Cerundolo7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-3
2025-04-23Madrid MastersQ2clayJuan Manuel Cerundolo7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5)

Statistics

Recent form
Cerundolo J.Van De Zandschulp B.
56%1st serve in+7%63%
70%1st serve points won+3%73%
54%2nd serve points won+8%46%
63%Service points won63%
40%Return points won+2%38%
63%Break points saved+4%59%
4.5Aces / match+1.76.2
2.2Double faults / match+2.24.4

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (19 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Barrios Vera T.
Cerundolo J.[5]
7-676-3
Semi-finals
Cerundolo J.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.[3]
7-56-4
Barrios Vera T.
Haase R.
6-34-66-2
Quarter-finals
Haase R.
Moraing M.
4-66-36-3
Barrios Vera T.
Altmaier D.[1]
6-41-67-64
Cerundolo J.[5]
Horansky F.
3-66-17-5
Van De Zandschulp B.[3]
Klein L.
6-43-66-4
R16
Barrios Vera T.
Kuhn N.
W/O
Haase R.
Otte O.[4]
3-67-56-3
Van De Zandschulp B.[3]
Lestienne C.
6-43-66-4
Horansky F.
Dzumhur D.[2]
7-642-66-2
Cerundolo J.[5]
Marterer M.
6-47-63
Klein L.
Ajdukovic D.
6-44-66-4
Altmaier D.[1]
Kopriva V.
7-633-66-3
Moraing M.
Kicker N.
6-46-2
R32
Altmaier D.[1]
Tabilo A.
6-07-5
Dzumhur D.[2]
Bemelmans R.
6-36-3
Kopriva V.
Fatic N.
7-56-2
Klein L.
Kamke T.
6-16-2
Marterer M.
Molleker R.
3-66-36-2
Van De Zandschulp B.[3]
Cid R.
3-66-47-64
Haase R.
De Jong J.
6-36-756-4
Kicker N.
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Horansky F.
Collarini A.
6-46-2
Ajdukovic D.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-737-5
Otte O.[4]
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-4
Lestienne C.
Safiullin R.
6-46-736-4
Kuhn N.
Hardt N.
6-46-3
Moraing M.
Machac T.[6]
7-606-3
Cerundolo J.[5]
Coppejans K.
2-66-26-2
Barrios Vera T.
Nagal S.[8]
7-54-66-3