Facundo Mena vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli — Prague 2 CH Quarter-final

Prague 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ARG
Facundo Mena
[4]
#303ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 August 2021
clay
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#59ATP
1757ELO
1739Clay ELO
$502kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLWL

Facundo Mena defeated Camilo Ugo Carabelli 6-3 6-7 6-1 in the Prague 2 CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Camilo Ugo Carabelli came in ranked #59, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Facundo Mena claimed a first win over Camilo Ugo Carabelli in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Mena came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–3 6–7 6–1.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Ugo Carabelli C.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.8Clay Elo 1406
Surface ELO
9.2+333 Clay Elo edge
1.0Overall Elo 1427
ELO gap
9.0Overall Elo 1757
10.0
H2H
0.0
3.1
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
4.4
7.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Mena F.
66662
Ugo Carabelli C.
37811

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-02-06CordobaQ1clayCamilo Ugo Carabelli6-3 6-4

Statistics

Recent form
Mena F.Ugo Carabelli C.
57%1st serve in+5%62%
74%1st serve points won+5%69%
50%2nd serve points won+1%49%
64%Service points won+3%61%
39%Return points won+4%35%
59%Break points saved+5%64%
7.3Aces / match+4.23.1
2.8Double faults / match+0.52.3

Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Draw

Final
Svrcina D.
Popko D.[2]
6-07-5
Semi-finals
Svrcina D.
Forejtek J.
7-56-4
Popko D.[2]
Mena F.[4]
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Popko D.[2]
Bonadio R.[6]
6-36-2
Svrcina D.
Furness E.
7-55-76-4
Mena F.[4]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-36-766-1
Forejtek J.
Milojevic N.[1]
6-46-3
R16
Bonadio R.[6]
Nava E.
6-46-3
Milojevic N.[1]
Blancaneaux G.
3-66-33-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Tiurnev E.
6-36-4
Forejtek J.
Jianu F.
6-24-66-1
Svrcina D.
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
6-756-16-4
Furness E.
Giustino L.[3]
7-644-66-3
Popko D.[2]
Oliveira G.
6-06-3
Mena F.[4]
Serdarusic N.
6-26-4
R32
Tiurnev E.
Vrbensky M.[8]
6-46-2
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
Baldi F.
6-37-62
Oliveira G.
Kodat T.
6-36-1
Svrcina D.
Skatov T.
6-36-2
Ugo Carabelli C.
Agamenone F.
1-66-46-4
Nava E.
Melzer G.
3-66-26-1
Giustino L.[3]
Karlovskiy E.
7-646-2
Serdarusic N.
Andreev A.
6-36-3
Milojevic N.[1]
Arnaboldi A.
6-726-06-1
Furness E.
Krumich M.
4-66-46-3
Popko D.[2]
Vatutin A.
7-56-1
Forejtek J.
Jarry N.[5]
4-66-46-2
Blancaneaux G.
Ritschard A.
6-16-3
Mena F.[4]
Miedler L.
6-27-5
Jianu F.
Aragone J.
6-06-2
Bonadio R.[6]
Zverev M.
6-32-66-3