Kristyna Pliskova vs Martina Trevisan — Cluj-Napoca 1 Round of 32

Cluj-Napoca 1 · WTA · Round of 32
CZE
Kristyna Pliskova
34 yrs · 184 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 August 2021
clay
Martina Trevisan
ITA4
Martina Trevisan
#405WTA
1462ELO
1450Clay ELO
32 yrs · 160 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLL
Pliskova K.
6-4 6-4
Trevisan M.
Pliskova K.
662
Trevisan M.
440

Kristyna Pliskova defeated Martina Trevisan 6-4 6-4 in the Cluj-Napoca 1 round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Kristyna Pliskova edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pliskova K.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Trevisan M.

Trevisan M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Pliskova K.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pliskova K.Trevisan M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
73%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
54%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.5
0.9
Double faults / match·Even
4.1
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pliskova K.Trevisan M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
52
Break points saved·Dominant
85
51
Break points won·Dominant
12
90
Deciding sets·Dominant
4
59
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pliskova K.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Trevisan M.
3.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
  • Surface jump clay↔grass (−0.8)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
3.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Petkovic A.[2]
Sherif M.
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Petkovic A.[2]
Krunic A.
6-46-2
Sherif M.
Buzarnescu M.
7-616-4
Quarter-finals
Krunic A.
Schmiedlova A.
6-36-0
Sherif M.
Kucova K.[8]
6-36-1
Buzarnescu M.
Pliskova K.
7-56-3
Petkovic A.[2]
Mendez S.
6-766-46-1
R16
Mendez S.
Tsurenko L.
4-3
Sherif M.
Eala A.
6-26-2
Buzarnescu M.
Arruabarrena L.
6-37-5
Kucova K.[8]
Bara I.
2-67-637-65
Pliskova K.
Kawa K.
6-46-4
Schmiedlova A.
Juvan K.[6]
7-676-0
Krunic A.
Bogdan A.[3]
6-36-3
Petkovic A.[2]
Cristian J.
6-46-3
R32
Krunic A.
Naito Y.
6-35-0
Eala A.
Ormaechea P.
7-56-2
Bara I.
Friedsam A.
6-26-3
Petkovic A.[2]
Dulgheru A.
6-34-1
Sherif M.
Cornet A.[1]
6-26-4
Kucova K.[8]
Buyukakcay C.
6-16-1
Pliskova K.
Trevisan M.[4]
6-46-4
Bogdan A.[3]
Udvardy P.
6-26-4
Tsurenko L.
Ruse E.[5]
6-36-3
Kawa K.
Szabo B.
6-26-1
Buzarnescu M.
Tomova V.[7]
6-26-3
Juvan K.[6]
Melnikova M.
6-16-1
Schmiedlova A.
Hruncakova V.
6-46-2
Mendez S.
Fett J.
6-26-2
Cristian J.
Jani R.
6-16-2