Vasek Pospisil vs Emilio Gomez — Washington Round of 64

Washington · ATP · Round of 64
CAN
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 August 2021
hard
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Pospisil V.
4-6 6-3 6-3
Gomez E.
Pospisil V.
4662
Gomez E.
6331

Vasek Pospisil defeated Emilio Gomez 4-6 6-3 6-3 in the Washington round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (138 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
77
Break points won·Clear edge
7
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
23
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Pospisil V.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gomez E.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.2
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
4.9
Country comfort
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
25°CMainly clear
Wind 11 km/hHumidity 49%
Final
Sinner J.[5]
Mcdonald M.
7-54-67-5
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[5]
Brooksby J.
7-626-1
Mcdonald M.
Nishikori K.
6-43-67-5
Quarter-finals
Brooksby J.
Millman J.[11]
6-16-2
Mcdonald M.
Kudla D.
6-36-2
Nishikori K.
Harris L.[14]
6-37-5
Sinner J.[5]
Johnson S.
6-46-2
R16
Brooksby J.
Auger Aliassime F.[2]
6-36-4
Millman J.[11]
Opelka R.[8]
6-37-64
Johnson S.
Berankis R.
6-26-1
Sinner J.[5]
Korda S.[12]
7-637-63
Kudla D.
Nakashima B.
3-67-636-4
Mcdonald M.
Ivashka I.
6-46-4
Nishikori K.
Norrie C.[7]
3-66-36-3
Harris L.[14]
Nadal R.[1]
6-41-66-4
R32
Nakashima B.
Evans D.[6]
7-616-0
Kudla D.
Fritz T.[10]
6-46-2
Ivashka I.
Dimitrov G.[4]
6-27-64
Nadal R.[1]
Sock J.
6-24-67-61
Harris L.[14]
Sandgren T.
6-41-0
Auger Aliassime F.[2]
Seppi A.
2-66-26-2
Johnson S.
De Minaur A.[3]
6-756-46-2
Sinner J.[5]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-26-4
Norrie C.[7]
Giron M.
6-46-3
Nishikori K.
Bublik A.[9]
6-27-5
Brooksby J.
Tiafoe F.[16]
7-647-5
Millman J.[11]
Ymer E.
6-27-68
Opelka R.[8]
Galan D.
7-616-3
Berankis R.
Kecmanovic M.[15]
6-36-2
Korda S.[12]
Pospisil V.
7-56-4
Mcdonald M.
Paire B.[13]
6-766-46-4
R64
Seppi A.
Uchiyama Y.
3-67-56-3
Ymer E.
Thompson J.
3-67-56-3
Sock J.
Nishioka Y.
6-734-0
Galan D.
Paul T.
6-46-3
Nishikori K.
Querrey S.
6-46-3
Johnson S.
Ramanathan R.
6-37-60
Berankis R.
Krueger M.
7-646-2
Pospisil V.
Gomez E.
4-66-36-3
Nakashima B.
Popyrin A.
6-36-3
Kudla D.
Lopez F.
6-36-756-3
Mcdonald M.
Kyrgios N.
6-46-4
Ivashka I.
Gerasimov E.
7-56-4
Giron M.
Marchenko I.
4-66-47-61
Sandgren T.
Duckworth J.
6-32-66-2
Brooksby J.
Anderson K.
7-646-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Gunneswaran P.
2-66-16-1