Mayar Sherif vs Alexandra Eala — Cluj-Napoca 1 Round of 16

Cluj-Napoca 1 · WTA · Round of 16
Mayar Sherif
EGY
Mayar Sherif
#97WTA
1685ELO
1663Clay ELO
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 August 2021
clay
Alexandra Eala
PHI
Alexandra Eala
#28WTA
1895ELO
1677Clay ELO
$871kYTD
$2.2MCAREER
21 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Sherif M.
6-2 6-2
Eala A.
Sherif M.
662
Eala A.
220

Mayar Sherif defeated Alexandra Eala 6-2 6-2 in the Cluj-Napoca 1 round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Alexandra Eala came in ranked #28.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sherif M.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Eala A.

Eala A.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Sherif M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sherif M.Eala A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
73%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
60%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
57%
53%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
1.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 149). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sherif M.Eala A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
67
77
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
75
Break points won·Clear edge
81
97
Deciding sets·Clear edge
58
82
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
89
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sherif M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Eala A.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
4.7Clay Elo 1663
Surface ELO
5.3+14 Clay Elo edge
2.2Overall Elo 1685
ELO gap
7.8Overall Elo 1895
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0Lost last 6
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sherif M.Eala A.
Freshness·Dominant
52
84

Sherif M.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 115 games (7d) · Eala A.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 29 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Petkovic A.[2]
Sherif M.
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Petkovic A.[2]
Krunic A.
6-46-2
Sherif M.
Buzarnescu M.
7-616-4
Quarter-finals
Krunic A.
Schmiedlova A.
6-36-0
Sherif M.
Kucova K.[8]
6-36-1
Buzarnescu M.
Pliskova K.
7-56-3
Petkovic A.[2]
Mendez S.
6-766-46-1
R16
Mendez S.
Tsurenko L.
4-3
Sherif M.
Eala A.
6-26-2
Buzarnescu M.
Arruabarrena L.
6-37-5
Kucova K.[8]
Bara I.
2-67-637-65
Pliskova K.
Kawa K.
6-46-4
Schmiedlova A.
Juvan K.[6]
7-676-0
Krunic A.
Bogdan A.[3]
6-36-3
Petkovic A.[2]
Cristian J.
6-46-3
R32
Krunic A.
Naito Y.
6-35-0
Eala A.
Ormaechea P.
7-56-2
Bara I.
Friedsam A.
6-26-3
Petkovic A.[2]
Dulgheru A.
6-34-1
Sherif M.
Cornet A.[1]
6-26-4
Kucova K.[8]
Buyukakcay C.
6-16-1
Pliskova K.
Trevisan M.[4]
6-46-4
Bogdan A.[3]
Udvardy P.
6-26-4
Tsurenko L.
Ruse E.[5]
6-36-3
Kawa K.
Szabo B.
6-26-1
Buzarnescu M.
Tomova V.[7]
6-26-3
Juvan K.[6]
Melnikova M.
6-16-1
Schmiedlova A.
Hruncakova V.
6-46-2
Mendez S.
Fett J.
6-26-2
Cristian J.
Jani R.
6-16-2