Jaqueline Cristian vs Reka Luca Jani — Cluj-Napoca 1 Round of 32

Cluj-Napoca 1 · WTA · Round of 32
Jaqueline Cristian
ROU
Jaqueline Cristian
#36WTA
1834ELO
1746Clay ELO
$742kYTD
$3.7MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 August 2021
clay
HUN
Reka Luca Jani
34 yrs · 161 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Cristian J.
6-1 6-2
Jani R.
Cristian J.
662
Jani R.
120

Jaqueline Cristian defeated Reka Luca Jani 6-1 6-2 in the Cluj-Napoca 1 round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cristian J.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Jani R.

Jani R.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Cristian J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Cristian J.Jani R.
37
Serve
—
10
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cristian J.Jani R.
1st serve in·Clear edge
60%
75%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
54%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
40%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
51%
Return points won·Even
43%
46%
Break points saved·Even
54%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
0.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cristian J.Jani R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
15
Break points saved·Dominant
84
6
Break points won·Clear edge
71
51
Deciding sets·Clear edge
91
69
Tiebreaks·
88
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cristian J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jani R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Petkovic A.[2]
Sherif M.
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Petkovic A.[2]
Krunic A.
6-46-2
Sherif M.
Buzarnescu M.
7-616-4
Quarter-finals
Krunic A.
Schmiedlova A.
6-36-0
Sherif M.
Kucova K.[8]
6-36-1
Buzarnescu M.
Pliskova K.
7-56-3
Petkovic A.[2]
Mendez S.
6-766-46-1
R16
Mendez S.
Tsurenko L.
4-3
Sherif M.
Eala A.
6-26-2
Buzarnescu M.
Arruabarrena L.
6-37-5
Kucova K.[8]
Bara I.
2-67-637-65
Pliskova K.
Kawa K.
6-46-4
Schmiedlova A.
Juvan K.[6]
7-676-0
Krunic A.
Bogdan A.[3]
6-36-3
Petkovic A.[2]
Cristian J.
6-46-3
R32
Krunic A.
Naito Y.
6-35-0
Eala A.
Ormaechea P.
7-56-2
Bara I.
Friedsam A.
6-26-3
Petkovic A.[2]
Dulgheru A.
6-34-1
Sherif M.
Cornet A.[1]
6-26-4
Kucova K.[8]
Buyukakcay C.
6-16-1
Pliskova K.
Trevisan M.[4]
6-46-4
Bogdan A.[3]
Udvardy P.
6-26-4
Tsurenko L.
Ruse E.[5]
6-36-3
Kawa K.
Szabo B.
6-26-1
Buzarnescu M.
Tomova V.[7]
6-26-3
Juvan K.[6]
Melnikova M.
6-16-1
Schmiedlova A.
Hruncakova V.
6-46-2
Mendez S.
Fett J.
6-26-2
Cristian J.
Jani R.
6-16-2