Mats Moraing vs Tobias Kamke — Poznan CH Round of 32

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Mats Moraing
34 yrs · 198 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
clay
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
Moraing M.
6-4 6-2
Kamke T.
Moraing M.
662
Kamke T.
420

Mats Moraing defeated Tobias Kamke 6-4 6-2 in the Poznan CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Mats Moraing came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Mats Moraing extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-09-17MetzQ1hardMats Moraing7-6(3) 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Moraing M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Kamke T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Moraing M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Moraing M.Kamke T.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
1.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Moraing M.Kamke T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
40
14
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
69
Break points won·Even
18
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
17
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
18
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Moraing M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kamke T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
9.1
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Lehecka J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Shevchenko A.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Popko D.[7]
1-67-57-5
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
7-56-3
Shevchenko A.
Kolar Z.[5]
6-46-1
Popko D.[7]
Kicker N.
3-66-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Muller A.
6-27-68
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Zekic M.
6-46-1
Lehecka J.
Vukic A.
6-36-4
Shevchenko A.
Ejupovic E.
7-633-67-63
Kolar Z.[5]
Cachin P.
6-44-67-5
Popko D.[7]
Marcora R.
6-06-3
Kicker N.
Guinard M.
6-26-4
Muller A.
Mena F.
6-36-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Moraing M.
4-67-56-3
R32
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Michalski D.
6-26-3
Zekic M.
Elias G.
6-27-5
Lehecka J.
Lamasine T.
6-37-5
Vukic A.
Andreozzi G.[8]
6-16-4
Ejupovic E.
Poljak D.
6-26-4
Cachin P.
Domingues J.
6-36-1
Popko D.[7]
Kopriva V.
6-44-67-5
Guinard M.
Orlikowski A.
6-37-5
Muller A.
Couacaud E.[6]
6-36-2
Mena F.
De Jong J.
6-30-66-4
Moraing M.
Kamke T.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-16-1
Shevchenko A.
Borg L.
7-56-2
Kolar Z.[5]
Forejtek J.
6-46-4
Marcora R.
Janvier M.
6-36-2
Kicker N.
Furness E.
6-27-5