Facundo Mena vs Jesper De Jong — Poznan CH Round of 32

Poznan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
clay
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
Mena F.
6-3 0-6 6-4
De Jong J.
Mena F.
6062
De Jong J.
3641

Facundo Mena defeated Jesper De Jong 6-3 0-6 6-4 in the Poznan CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Mena closed it out in three sets, 6–3 0–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mena F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

De Jong J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mena F.De Jong J.
1st serve in·Even
56%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Even
5.4
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mena F.De Jong J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
9
57
Break points saved·Dominant
57
90
Break points won·Dominant
7
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
De Jong J.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.2Clay Elo 1406
Surface ELO
7.8+290 Clay Elo edge
2.5Overall Elo 1427
ELO gap
7.5Overall Elo 1711
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
8.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
4.5
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mena F.De Jong J.
Freshness·Slight edge
70
78

Mena F.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d) · De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Lehecka J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Lehecka J.
Shevchenko A.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Popko D.[7]
1-67-57-5
Quarter-finals
Lehecka J.
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
7-56-3
Shevchenko A.
Kolar Z.[5]
6-46-1
Popko D.[7]
Kicker N.
3-66-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Muller A.
6-27-68
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Zekic M.
6-46-1
Lehecka J.
Vukic A.
6-36-4
Shevchenko A.
Ejupovic E.
7-633-67-63
Kolar Z.[5]
Cachin P.
6-44-67-5
Popko D.[7]
Marcora R.
6-06-3
Kicker N.
Guinard M.
6-26-4
Muller A.
Mena F.
6-36-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Moraing M.
4-67-56-3
R32
Van De Zandschulp B.[2]
Michalski D.
6-26-3
Zekic M.
Elias G.
6-27-5
Lehecka J.
Lamasine T.
6-37-5
Vukic A.
Andreozzi G.[8]
6-16-4
Ejupovic E.
Poljak D.
6-26-4
Cachin P.
Domingues J.
6-36-1
Popko D.[7]
Kopriva V.
6-44-67-5
Guinard M.
Orlikowski A.
6-37-5
Muller A.
Couacaud E.[6]
6-36-2
Mena F.
De Jong J.
6-30-66-4
Moraing M.
Kamke T.
6-46-2
Zapata Miralles B.[1]
Coppejans K.
6-16-1
Shevchenko A.
Borg L.
7-56-2
Kolar Z.[5]
Forejtek J.
6-46-4
Marcora R.
Janvier M.
6-36-2
Kicker N.
Furness E.
6-27-5