Jason Kubler vs Emilio Gomez — Lexington CH Round of 32

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1635Hard ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
ECU5
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Kubler J.
6-1 3-6 7-6
Gomez E.
Kubler J.
63782
Gomez E.
16661

Jason Kubler defeated Emilio Gomez 6-1 3-6 7-6 in the Lexington CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (172 vs 195). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
77
Break points won·Dominant
46
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kubler J.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gomez E.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
6.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.4
Minutes 14d
8.5
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kubler J.
Tabilo A.[6]
7-56-727-5
Semi-finals
Kubler J.
Escobedo E.[7]
6-26-3
Tabilo A.[6]
Kokkinakis T.[8]
7-636-776-3
Quarter-finals
Kubler J.
Olivieri G.
4-66-37-5
Escobedo E.[7]
King D.
7-56-0
Tabilo A.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-646-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Brooksby J.[1]
6-42-66-4
R16
Olivieri G.
Mukund S.
6-36-3
King D.
Cressy M.[3]
4-67-626-2
Escobedo E.[7]
Cid R.
6-47-61
Tabilo A.[6]
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Ramanathan R.
Polansky P.
6-46-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Ficovich J.
6-14-66-3
Kubler J.
Mchugh A.
6-46-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Blanch U.
6-766-5
R32
Ficovich J.
Leshem E.
6-16-2
Olivieri G.
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Schnur B.
6-36-4
Mchugh A.
Mejia N.
7-634-66-1
Kubler J.
Gomez E.[5]
6-13-67-66
Cressy M.[3]
Ito T.
4-66-36-4
King D.
Quiroz R.
6-46-1
Escobedo E.[7]
Nanda G.
6-16-4
Tabilo A.[6]
Dostanic S.
6-26-0
Ramanathan R.
Wu T.
6-46-0
Polansky P.
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-36-4
Kokkinakis T.[8]
Harrison C.
7-55-76-2
Blanch U.
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-4
Brooksby J.[1]
Draxl L.
6-36-3
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
3-66-46-2
Kozlov S.
Eubanks C.
7-637-66