Peter Gojowczyk vs Sam Querrey — Atlanta Round of 32

Atlanta · ATP · Round of 32
GER
Peter Gojowczyk
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 July 2021
hard
USA
Sam Querrey
38 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
Gojowczyk P.
4-6 7-6 7-6
Querrey S.
Gojowczyk P.
477772
Querrey S.
663651

Peter Gojowczyk defeated Sam Querrey 4-6 7-6 7-6 in the Atlanta round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Peter Gojowczyk came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Peter Gojowczyk extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-05-14Rome MastersR64clayPeter Gojowczyk6-2 7-6(7)

Serve vs return

This season
Gojowczyk P.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Querrey S.

Querrey S.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gojowczyk P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojowczyk P.Querrey S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
52%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
80%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
30%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
13.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojowczyk P.Querrey S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
61
49
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
96
Break points won·Clear edge
35
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
75
63
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
76
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojowczyk P.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Querrey S.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
3.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
8.3
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Isner J.[6]
Nakashima B.
7-687-5
Semi-finals
Isner J.[6]
Fritz T.[5]
7-645-76-3
Nakashima B.
Ruusuvuori E.
3-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Fritz T.[5]
Opelka R.[4]
7-656-737-64
Isner J.[6]
Oconnell C.
7-656-736-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Norrie C.[3]
7-616-3
Nakashima B.
Thompson J.
7-657-5
R16
Nakashima B.
Raonic M.[1]
5-76-37-64
Ruusuvuori E.
Paire B.[7]
4-66-43-0
Opelka R.[4]
Fratangelo B.
7-637-64
Oconnell C.
Sinner J.[2]
7-676-4
Norrie C.[3]
Kyrgios N.
6-16-4
Thompson J.
Gojowczyk P.
7-666-4
Isner J.[6]
Sock J.
7-666-4
Fritz T.[5]
Johnson S.
6-756-46-1
R32
Fratangelo B.
Seppi A.
7-57-65
Oconnell C.
Kudla D.
4-66-36-3
Sock J.
Berankis R.
6-746-47-5
Isner J.[6]
Wolf J.
6-46-736-4
Johnson S.
Popyrin A.
7-646-3
Fritz T.[5]
Donskoy E.
6-36-4
Paire B.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-726-4
Ruusuvuori E.
Mcdonald M.
7-637-5
Kyrgios N.
Anderson K.
7-646-3
Gojowczyk P.
Querrey S.
4-67-637-65
Nakashima B.
Bryde T.
6-16-756-4
Thompson J.
Harris L.[8]
7-621-66-2